MACD 0 line cross daily charts

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by JSSPMK, May 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    whoa! pretty creative, remind me of AMT4SWA.:)
     
    #31     May 26, 2007
  2. Allaces

    Allaces

    #32     May 26, 2007
  3. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    I don't make a living from trading, I specialise in NLE & photography, so no snake oil to follow. Only for sharing & discussing.
     
    #33     May 26, 2007
  4. Allaces

    Allaces

    Exactly.. you don't make a living from trading but are trying to tell successful traders that you have improved SPM.. stick to click click shutterboy
     
    #34     May 26, 2007
  5. Allaces

    Allaces

    You made a complete fool of yourself in a previous thread by stating that 3 heads in a row increased the chances for a tail on the 4th toss.. then you stubbornly refused to believe anyone that told you how wrong you were and still held out when links were provided to mathematically refute your outrageous and ignorant stance.. casino's would go broke if you were even slightly right

    And this underpins your whole theory of only taking zero line crosses after failures because you think that it increases the chances

    Are we really supposed to take someone who doesn't understand this simple rule of probability seriously enough to even bother looking at your hand picked charts?
     
    #35     May 26, 2007
  6. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    The charts will be posted daily!
     
    #36     May 26, 2007
  7. Allaces

    Allaces

    You made a complete fool of yourself in a previous thread by stating that 3 heads in a row increased the chances for a tail on the 4th toss.. then you stubbornly refused to believe anyone that told you how wrong you were and still held out when links were provided to mathematically refute your outrageous and ignorant stance.. casino's would go broke if you were even slightly correct

    And this underpins your whole theory of only taking zero line crosses after failures because you think that it increases the chances

    Are we really supposed to take someone who doesn't understand this simple rule of probability seriously enough to even bother looking at your hand picked charts?
     
    #37     May 26, 2007
  8. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    Nkhoi, do you consider it normal what's happening on this thread? If I am even slightly in the wrong in your opinion, perhaps you also think that I have somehow stolen something from another ET member that he claims rights to an established MACD pattern, that I have claimed rights to his method? If you tell me that I am in the wrong here then I have no problem with stopping posting on this forum. I am not here to entertain or be spoken about in such a manner. I will forward this to Baron.
     
    #38     May 26, 2007
  9. Allaces

    Allaces

    It's a traders forum JSSPMK.. and you have already admitted you are not a trader.. you also don't understand simple probability.. your entire premise is built on a statistical impossibility.. so for you to be "teaching" us "your" method is laughable
     
    #39     May 26, 2007
  10. MACD @ 4,13,9 setting that I have always used (with a 5,5,2 STOCH), and 1/2 "Peak" or "Valley" of the 4/13 line for the trade set-ups.
     
    #40     May 27, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.