Not necessarily disagreeing with your premise on some BB stocks, but surely you are not making a statement of fact that Manchester is definitely a BB scam/fraud. Or are you?
Time will tell you. So far it is all press releases by agencies known to be BB agencies. One of the Mad Cow companies which was suspended for trading had press releases saying Intel had tied up with it to provide chip to be inserted in cows ears. Later it was found out it was just press release.
Did you read the latest SEC filing? Note: I'm not being accusatory; I am neither an advocate for, or detractor of MNSC. DD has to be as much objective as it does somewhat skeptical.
You know I made one fatal error. I should have encouraged ya'll to double up. That would have accomplished a more noble goal. Next time I'm gonna join in the cheerleading. I'm gonna shoot for the moon alice. I'm gonna go for dem triple digit gains, and ignore the absurdity of it all. lolololoolololololool. yeah. Congrats to all ! Used to be Bobby.
I'm going out on a limb here, but don't you think a multi-million dollar operation such as Nice Cars and Nice Cars acceptance corp.,would get their lawyers on this if it weren't true? I'm sure that with the recent price fluctuations,the obvious calls to confirm the purchase of the two entities were made. I assume at least two calls were placed,one from regulatory authorities and another from the shorts. I doubt that hack "reporter" made any calls whatsoever,lol. Like I've said before I believe this company is legitamate and has the goods. I'll call Nice cars on Monday and post their response.
I have read that. Even if it is a genuine company, is this a biotech company or some technology company, which has found some miraculous new solution to have this kind of move. Look at stocks like FLT, REFR, DYII etc. There are several companies in the past tried same hype/PR games. Read the Sec filings on them. This is an old trick in the business. Many newsletter writers are paid to promote such kinds of stock. Look at the case of FLT http://www.stocklemon.com/articles/08_12_03.html http://www.stocklemon.com/articles/08_20_03.html Look at the chart during 2003 and see what happened. In this case it is not probably the shorts that drove that price down, it is drying up of bids (absence of new buyers) which created that air pocket. As that happens existing holders are forced to offer lower price to get somebody to buy their shares. That probably explains that gap.
You know. That wouldn't convince us. What would convince us is if you show us the transaction statement that you double up or triple up your stake in MNCS on Monday. Of course if you bet your entire fortune on this stock, hey I'm convinced. money talks. Words are cheap.