Sure. It is possible something else substantial comes up. Don’t blame democrats though, the White House is responsible for the selection.
Avenatti and other sleazeballs will be busy the next few days discovering and promoting false accusers.
I just assumed she was near black out drunk. I've never been attempted raped, so wonder if some Ptsd type condition occurrs.
The media circus that surrounds a nominee is more reflective of the poor selection of a nominee than any particular party. I will again refer you right wingers back to Gorsuch and Roberts for some recent appointments that were vetted for these things as opposed to what we are seeing with Roy Moore, I meant Brett “frat boy” Kavanaugh.
not really. Gorsuch replaced a conservative. This is for a a very critical swing vote which could change things for a generation. Massive difference.
Crock. Maybe the media circus has been more with kavanauch because the media loves the salacious stuff so the dems have produced some. Otherwise, if kavanaugh is confirmed it will strictly be along party lines with 2 or 3 dem crossovers, which was exactly the same case for Gorsuch. The dems simply dug their heels in and created more noise, opposition, and fake accusations because kavanaugh's appointment will truly tip the balance and the dems know it. Not because kavanaugh is a worse appointee. If Gorsuch had been the one to tip the balance he would become a serial rapist too- allegedly. Sparticus Lindsey Graham made a pithy but valid quip to Kavanaugh. He said: "When you see Kagan and Sotomayor, tell them that Lindsey says hello, because I voted for both of them." The point being that votes are along party lines now which requires the demonization of nominees of the opposing party. Hopefully, no one here is stupid enough to think that the presumed FBI investigation will result in picking up any new dem votes whatsoever even if the fbi report is uneventful. The fbi report is simply to provide cover for the 2 dems already looking for a means to justify voting for kavanaugh because they are in Trump country, and to provide cover for RINO's Collins and Murkowski if they are already leaning in that direction. Otherwise, not a single one of the dem clowns will do anything other than complain about the time and the investigation are never enough.
Blah blah blah. The same argument was made for Roy Moore. Spare me. Again, don’t blame the democrats every time republicans put up a shitty nominee or candidate.
Gorsuch was not a shitty nominee. Yet every dem senator - except for the 2 or 3 in Trump country immediately announced that they would vote against him the minute he was nominated and then did so. Kavanaugh was not a shitty nominee. He has a very distinguished record both personally and professionally and has served for twelve years as chief of the most important court in the country -second to the Supreme Court. You can create a kool-aid, trance-state argument that his problem is that all of these sex accusations have come up and that makes him a shitty nominee. However, the reality is that those outrageous accusations have not cost him a single vote among dems. Every single one of them- with the exception of the couple noted- had already declared that they would vote against him long before any of that came up. Is that true or not true? The dems are functioning as a resistance movement, not as independent evaluators of nominees. The notion that 45 of them did or will vote against gorsuch or kavanaugh on their merits is absurd. The tard senators all immediately declared that they would vote against kavanaugh and then proceeded to complain bitterly that they needed to see george bush's presidential communications in order to be able to make a decision about a nominee that they had already decided to vote against. What's wrong with that picture class?