Low IQ-countries can't establish or maintain democracy

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Ditch, Aug 26, 2015.

  1. Ditch

    Ditch

    A very interesting article on the future of Europe.

    https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2015/08/25/denmark-europe-is-committing-collective-suicide/

    Danish debate: “Europe is committing collective suicide”
    Published August 25, 2015, Fria Tider (Bing translated and adapted)

    In Denmark there is right now a large debate on the mass immigration. In the Jyllands Posten history professor Bent Jensen writes, “European elites consciously is to destroy their own civilization”, while psychology professor Helmuth Nyborg warns that democracy can become a thing of the past when groups of people with low IQ takes over ‘our countries’.

    Bent Jensen compares in his op-ed article the current influx into Europe with historic migrations. His conclusion is that today’s situation is unique.

    “It is firstly about people from a culture that differs radically from the European culture and who either have no desire or willingness to be assimilated, but requires special treatment. Secondly, we are dealing with potentially incalculable human flows that will destroy the European communities unless they are not stopped. ”

    Something else that is historically unique is that the elites in Europe actively facilitates the destruction of their own country. The Professor cites Sweden as a frightening example.

    Sweden a frightening example

    “The elite’s false guilt complex, nihilism, naivete and history has already been mentioned. A study of the frightening development in Sweden’s provides a large part of the answer. Sweden is in a class of its own, but the Swedish illness can be found see all (Western) European countries. In Sweden the unholy alliance by pious politicians and (against the Swedes) an intolerant media managed to tyrannize the population to stand by and watch as their once well-ordered country turns into a place where no one can feel safe. ”

    Bent Jensen summarizes:

    “There is, in other words, no debate of migration and refugees in the traditional sense. What is happening instead is that Europeans passively allow themselves to be colonised by people from a foreign culture that has no place in Europe but want to enjoy the fruits of the Europeans ‘ diligence and creativity. ”

    Psychology professor Helmuth Nyborg has a different approach to the problem of immigration. He writes, also in Jyllands posten, that immigration from the third world leads to the fact that the average IQ level in Denmark is steadily dropping, which could threaten the whole democratic system.

    Low-IQ-countries

    He refers to studies that immigrants to Denmark has 86 in average in IQ and a forecast showing that the average inhabitant in Denmark therefore will have a 92 in IQ in 2085, when the ethnic Danes are in the minority. Then it will be hard to maintain democracy, according to the professor.

    “Modern Finnish research shows that countries with an IQ averaging less than 90 fail to create or maintain democracy. This explains why any attempt to bring democracy to countries with low IQ are doomed to failure. We can learn from Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq. Denmark is fast approaching a critical low IQ level, “writes Helmuth Nyborg.
     
  2. This looks like part of Odombo's plan for America. Let enough illiterate Hispanics and terrorists across our southern border, and it won't be long before "America isn't America" any longer.

    The Founders realized that if America was going to survive as a democratic republic, we would need informed, intelligent voters with "skin in the game". We used to have that. Not now, sadly.

    When America gets sufficiently "dumbed down", we will probably have Sharia Law. I think that's part of Odumbo's plan, too.
    :(
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2015
    FortuneTeller and Clubber Lang like this.
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    Baloney. Most of the worlds cesspits are NATO creations, the product of economic warfare. Iran was the seat of the Ottoman Empire. North Africa, Egypt etc. Afghanistan was extremely progressive and westernized in the 60's before America turned it into Russias Vietnam with the Mujahadeen etc. Iran the same. The Mullahs that took over Iran were a plant by the US-Britain. The Shah pissed off the whites by nationalizing oil, so they brought in the Mullahs who ran the nation into the ground. Economic warfare. Most of these failed states are run by NATO-backed despots. Do some research. That's why they back them. Kill the seed before it grows. These jackasses destroy and impoverish countries with their backward policies, so NATO never has to drop a bomb. Other countries implode so they never develop into a threat because they're dirt-floor poor. Thats how we "win". That's what NATO/America has been doing for the past 100 years...Covert, indirect war...
     
  4. Tsing Tao likes this.
  5. fhl

    fhl

    The Clintons have a 2 billion dollar enterprise that consisted of businesses and gov'ts giving tens of millions of dollars to it while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.

    The inside story of how the Clintons built a $2 billion global empire---- washpost


    George Stephanopolis admitted that nobody gives that kind of money and not expect something in return.

    imo, that is the threat to democracy, not a commercial run on tv by a corporation.
     
  6. The Clintons don't give a FUCK about anything or anybody but themselves. Can't fault them for promoting their self interest, just as most people do... just that it's wrong to foist their brand of BS on the rest of us.
     
  7. Unlike you, who thinks and worries about everyone else?
     

  8. Yes, we were much better off when the liberal media decided what we could hear and read.

    The Founders were rightly concerned that too much political debate could confuse people. That's why we have a First Amendment, to protect the massive business interests of media companies. In return, they help us by telling us what is acceptable and what is not. How would we have had gay marriage for example if people had been allowed to vote on it?

    We have too much money and corruption in politics and Hillary Clinton is the candidate overwhelmingly supported by the clear thinking people who believe that.