Looks like Victor Niederhoffer blew up again

Discussion in 'Trading' started by VictorBustoAgain, Apr 10, 2014.

  1. May be people are scarred of having another Meddoff :confused:
     
    #221     Apr 14, 2014
  2. I read Vic's "reversal" paper today. Let's say it's not very rigorous. His is a pure MR guy and so it stands to reason that he'd be a put-seller "at edge". Completely fallacious.
     
    #222     Apr 14, 2014
  3. sorry, I am not understanding your reasoning:
    what is completely fallacious?
     
    #223     Apr 14, 2014
  4. Brighton

    Brighton

    I think he's just using another word - fallacious - for MarketSurfer to flub sometime in the future.:p
     
    #224     Apr 14, 2014

  5. That was in reference to Zdreg whom I believe is female. No proof, just conjecture based on writing style.
     
    #225     Apr 14, 2014
  6. Interesting. Thanks.
     
    #226     Apr 14, 2014
  7. LMFAO! Fees on 30% plus annual verified returns from 1982 to 1996 pays for a lot of losses and provides a fat lifestyle for a century plus-- not to mention returns on his own capital. These posts can't be real. LOL!!
     
    #227     Apr 14, 2014
  8. He had to sell his silver after the 1997 blowup. Where does he get the money to go to the movies? Serious question.
     
    #228     Apr 14, 2014
  9. #229     Apr 14, 2014
  10. What's crazy is that Luskin and Krugman despise each other, but they are two of the biggest idiots in finance history.
     
    #230     Apr 14, 2014