ROFL, now that is something I never really thought of..... I will say that I do not know "mr. galt" and did not ask him, or anyone else, to do anything for me on this thread...period. My offers of help for others stand, and speak for themselves... and usually in PM's. I'm just casually observing this for a while... Don
Yes.... Don didn't offer me anything. Period. He just wished me luck and keep him updated. That's all.
Samson: >Just as if you where to ask someone to post a naked >picture of their wives it would not happen. (At least by >any decent respectful man) If you were offering to let me f*** your wife (for a fee of course), asking to see a picture would be totally relevent. >Money is a personal thing and as such is respected >by those that have worked hard to acquire it. >SO STOP ASKING, IT IS INSULTING AND DISRESPECTFUL. In the requested context there is nothing insulting about it. See above. JB
Ah dudes, I would not go around talking about people's wife's in this manner. One day, you are going to piss of the wrong person. Seriously, pound on the maggotts, not by insulting them, but by using strict logic and honesty. The people that read these threads will cast their final vote by choosing to not spend their money on these impostors. But please, leave their innocent wife and children out of it. nitro
"Take my wife, please!" --- LOL Not really, and Nitro is, once again, correct in his suggestion that those who choose to play on the board at least keep it civil and and respectful. Don
If Samson took anything personal with my "wife" comments I profusely apologize. I simply disagreed with his "DISRESPECFUL" comment and used his own 'picture' example as a demonstration of a flaw in his logic. Let me rearrange the wording to be very clear on the point that I was making...asking a trading vendor for proof of financial gain from said method is equal to asking a pimp (or husband) for a naked picture of the woman offering her services. What would normally NOT be ok, becomes perfectly understandable in context. >I would not go around talking about people's >wife's in this manner. One day, you are going >to piss of the wrong person. Since Samson is not making said offer, nothing was being spoken about his wife. There is an "IF" at the beginning of the statement after all. And Nitro, I know it isn't clear from my post, but my "for a fee of course" comment was meant to imply that the hypothetical wife was in on the game and thus no "innocence" was involved. Again. Nothing personal or uncivil was intended. JB
Turok thank you for the explanation and no, I took no offence I have to say that in that case yes I agree with you, I was under the impression Mr. Galt was looking for a different kind of arrangement then just paying a vendor.
MrJohnGalt = WDGann yov all been had! I KNOW cause I am a co conspirator he ask me to co operate so i didd. macal the mod is also duplicitous. he knew B4 da fact. HA! APRIL FOOLS!!