You don't trade. Orders are not positions. Orders do not impact PNL. Positions do. Lot-matching algorithm is fantasy. It's made up. Like "layers" as synonym for edge. As if your silly front end and "layering" means anything to anyone else but you. Correctly termed, "FIFO" at least has relevance to taxation, etc., but no impact to whatever PNL you're posting. None of your gibberish has anything to do with capital markets. fullsemiauto cannot even price a forward (ASML) and we're to believe he's trading vol. Please. You have a 6% loss on open (sim) positions. You're shorting 15 puts for every long (put). That's all that matters.
Some last famous words: "Orders do not impact PNL", " Orders are not positions.", "Lot-matching algorithm is fantasy" LOL, ok, continue your raving public profession and display of blatant ignorance. Ah yes, sure certainly your PNL is not "impacted by orders", it's impacted by the dicks you take in your a$$, right. We know LOL People are rolling on the floor You are really and seriously retarded, besides blatantly ignorant, I can't really help you much more. Continue with your idiotic gambles and do not disturb the scientists, please.
Nice photoshop. Looks like it took some time. lol so all that matters is realized PNL. Ignoring sim-losses is convenient. I will s*ck my own dick if you're managing a penny in OPM.
> I will s*ck my own dick We know well you are used to it. If you want to have that pleasure, in addition to the many you already s*ck and deal with, just take an accurate look at 1 specific of my screenshots above (I will not point it out). [Inadvertently, I forgot to erase some of the investors' real $$$ accounts. (I beg forgiveness.) Anyway, now it's done and apparently, I can't erase them, but anyway, there is no way for most people to know whose accounts they are and fortunately, it's only showing one instrument and not the PNL curve.] In any case, what you think or believe is less important than a fart to all of us. One that is capable of writing that PNL does not depend on orders and many other similar idiocies, I am not sure what the heck is doing on ET. Actually, this can be an idea for the new site: I could call it DT "Donkey Trader" > all that matters is realized PNL Note that you are saying that. I did not. I said something quite different, but we know your intellectual capabilities. Never mind. Reaching a new record PNL today: 686.3K with a max of 686.6K in 571.24 total days running. Start cap 2MM. 40.91% of funds usage, at the moment. Current Broker info: Last values received: Fri 25 Aug 2023 21:15:46:236 Fri 25 Aug 2023 15:15:46:236 ET BuyingPower 11106541.90 USD [Min: 0.00, Max: 12900867.51] (6.67 x 1665981.28) FullAvailableFunds 1665981.28 USD FullExcessLiquidity 1838346.88 USD FullInitMarginReq 1125124.15 USD FullMaintMarginReq 952810.74 USD NetLiquidation 2791157.62 USD PNL curve: Current ES futures situation: ES FUT 202309 CME 50 E-mini S&P 500 [ESU3, 497222760, mult: 50] One example of a layer, showing how orders are used to modulate the position and hedge. Simplistically, and as a first approximation, you can think that the algorithm gets immediately rid of the short position if the price rises (to reenter the way down if funds are available): Transfer: ES FOP 20220930 2850 P CME 50 → ES FOP 20230616 2300 P CME 50 Transfer: ES FOP 20230616 2300 P CME 50 → ES FOP 20231020 2675 P CME 50 Clearly, there is much more to it, as we also have long legs active with high delta, that at the same time increase or decrease the position according to necessities, dampening any DD and also grabbing extra profit whenever possible.
The "Tommaso Gastaldi fraud" removed a wall of test from his scam-site. Must be concerned about regulators. https://www.datatime.eu/public/gbot/
destriero don't get so upset. Please donkey, do not cry and bray so loud. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cJg2x2g0T9o?feature=share 4 posts in a row? You are getting really hysterical now that you have begun to understand how many real MMs we are actually moving LOL Sorry, you can't participate in the party. This is for intelligent people with sufficient capital to be successful, and I am not referring to the capital part (which you lack anyway) LOL You count here less than a retarded donkey fart. But thank you for suggesting topics of discussion, even if they are way above your intellectual level. Also, thanks for advertising my website, which I would not do explicitly, with respect to the site owner @Baron. Please, do not overdo advertising, because I am already overwhelmed with my current many "friends". You know, $$$ always moves where it is convenient, and hedge funds are no more Remember that G-Bot is a strictly private initiative among "friends" who exchange personal favors, and therefore not subject to any "regulator" For anyone asking, of course, I always know no one and everything is fictitious $$$ LOL While you are at it, why do you not point also to some of my publications or projects? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X04002180 or my numerous appearances on National Television, RAI channels 1, 2, 3, prime time as a university professor? Information for knowledgeable readers (not the retards). ========================================= When IB says in your statement that your Net Liquidation is: NetLiquidation 2790821.76 USD that is what you actually have in your account after closing all positions and paying for the corresponding commission and spread. When G-Bot says that your PNL is for instance 686K, that is the exact figure that you have generated by the trading activity alone (excluding any other broker fee or interests) after you close all your positions (spread and commissions included). Let's take 1 simple example, with one layer, so it's easier to pinpoint. Let's take the following: ES FOP 20240216 2900 P CME 50 E-mini S&P 500 [EW3G4 P2900, 609545196, mult: 50] In this case, 1 possible PNL decomposition is the following: PNL Decompositions (without and with closing commission [ with Bid/Ask: 10.5 / 11 ] PNL = (Gain + Loss + Unrealized) - Comms 12521.58 = (51560.00 + -28637.50 + -9725.00) - 675.92 12493.18 = (51560.00 + -28637.50 + -9725.00) - 675.92 - 28.40 Note that all the possible PNL decomposition into the 2 components R (Realized) and U (Unrealized) are a large number. Another possible decomposition, for instance, is the following (this is in particular the so-called FIFO, although I prefer a different form of decomposition): PNL Decompositions (without and with closing commission [ with Bid/Ask: 10.5 / 11 ] PNL = (Gain + Loss + Unrealized) - Comms 12521.58 = (14837.50 + -3265.00 + 1625.00) - 675.92 12493.18 = (14837.50 + -3265.00 + 1625.00) - 675.92 - 28.40 Clearly, in both cases, we are talking of the same PNL. The decompositions are different because a different matching algo is used. It is also possible to create a decomposition that minimizes the "Realized" (which can be useful, in some countries for tax-related accounting purposes). (Clearly, this will usually be quite different from both FIFO and LIFO.) In particular, if you wish to run your own computations this is the original list of orders of this layer: Code: Buy Price Sell Price Qty ΔPrice ΔVal Comm Scalp ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.35 17.75 10 16.40 8200.00 28.40 8171.60 1.5 16.5 10 15.0 7500.0 28.40 7471.60 1.85 13.75 4 11.90 2380.00 19.88 2360.12 1.9 13.75 6 11.85 3555.00 17.04 3537.96 1.95 11.5 10 9.55 4775.00 28.40 4746.60 2.05 11 10 8.95 4475.00 28.40 4446.60 2.2 9.25 10 7.05 3525.00 28.40 3496.60 2.3 9 10 6.7 3350.0 28.40 3321.60 2.3 9 10 6.7 3350.0 28.40 3321.60 2.3 9 10 6.7 3350.0 28.40 3321.60 2.45 8 5 5.55 1387.50 14.20 1373.30 2.45 7 5 4.55 1137.50 14.20 1123.30 2.85 7 5 4.15 1037.50 14.20 1023.30 2.85 6.75 5 3.90 975.00 14.20 960.80 2.95 6.75 5 3.80 950.00 14.20 935.80 2.95 4.85 15 1.90 1425.00 42.60 1382.40 4.1 4.85 5 0.75 187.50 14.20 173.30 17.5 3.9 10 -13.6 -6800.0 28.40 -6828.40 16.5 3.25 10 -13.25 -6625.00 28.40 -6653.40 11.25 3.25 10 -8.00 -4000.00 28.40 -4028.40 8.75 3.15 10 -5.60 -2800.00 28.40 -2828.40 7 2.75 10 -4.25 -2125.00 28.40 -2153.40 6.75 2.5 10 -4.25 -2125.00 28.40 -2153.40 5.5 2.45 10 -3.05 -1525.00 28.40 -1553.40 4.9 2.1 10 -2.8 -1400.0 28.40 -1428.40 4.65 1.9 5 -2.75 -687.50 14.20 -701.70 4.1 1.9 5 -2.2 -550.0 14.20 -564.20 Now, in any case, given any set of orders, you can write the PNL in the following form: PNL = R + U or if you want to split it further, as I do PNL = (G - L) + U Now, given the set of orders, the PNL is a unique number. The decomposition, instead is arbitrary because it depends on how the lots are matched. Now if I close this layer, what I get is exactly: PNL = 12493.18 That is exactly my PNL. This happens because when you close, the Unrealized portion of the decomposition "disappears", and all lots can be matched. So you go from PNL = R + U to PNL = R' + 0 So the PNL that you see is exactly what you get. The decomposition might have some relevance for accounting purposes, but strategically it's not telling you much as it's arbitrary. Clearly, you could consider the min and max of the Unrealized over all possible order rearrangements and matchings and that can be useful for tax purposes or, strategically, to provide boundaries for your potential future profit. In fact, conceptually, in the most simplistic cases, the Unrealized is the only part that can turn into extra profits. (Clearly, it is not exactly so, because, depending on the matching algo, even the matched pairs can change over time as new orders are added.)
Four posts in a row? Come again? Link us. "That is exactly my PNL. This happens because when you close, the Unrealized portion of the decomposition "disappears", and all lots can be matched." All lots are matched FIFO when closed, which has nothing TF to do with your carrying sim-losses in order to fabricate sim-performance. The "Tommaso Gastaldi fraud" removed a wall of test from his scam-site. Must be concerned about regulators. https://www.datatime.eu/public/gbot/
Haha, you deleted the 4 highly defamatory posts? LOL Well, at least you are ashamed! LOL, you just read something cursorily on the Internet about lot matching, but you still have not understood a thing of it LOL Didn't you say that "Lot-matching algorithm is fantasy. It's made up." ? How come are you hysterically searching the web for those fantasies LOL
Couple of bits that stand out that I don't get, like the above...And this below... So the strategy is basically to collect premium by selling farOTM puts on ES, yes? And each one of those "legs" is 50 options? Who the hell is buying them? At what point did you sell those? Above, you are showing a roll I guess from Sep 2022 puts to Jun 2023 puts...When did you roll that? My main point is how can there be people buying such far OTM puts, (much less 50 of them?!?) you write today for the ES to be below 3000, and as low as 2550? That is some real damned pessimistic market outlook.
Why did you delete your last? Searching? The "Tommaso Gastaldi fraud" removed a wall of text from his scam-site. Must be concerned about regulators. https://www.datatime.eu/public/gbot/