No it's actually YOU who made fun of @SimpleMeLike's sharing of the news of his prospective interview at Goldman Sachs hinting at its impossibility just because he is who you consider as "retail trader" and thus not possessing any trading experience. If you haven't shown your callous attitude towards @SimpleMeLike's enthusiasm about his interview, I wouldn't have said anything. And besides, it's not me who's blathering that Goldman Sachs loses money overall; it's the whole entire fucking internet blathering about it cuz these are the facts. Your financial company idol loses money. LOL But you know what? I have been blathering at the wrong entity. There is nothing wrong with Goldman Sachs actually. All companies lose money (although Goldman Sach's involvement in several events of fraud is concerning) but the problem is you; it's your snobbish attitude about your so-called institutional experience which we choose to actually give you respect for and your contempt of our trading experience that you dismiss as "unprofessional" just because we don't work for a company and choose to work for ourselves that I should be blathering. And "unpaid"? How do you know we are "unpaid"? LOL Because we don't plaster fake screenshots like your option idol?
Made fun of SML???? For one,he said he had an interview at Goldman and was waiting on his second interview.. His idea of trading is click click click,dont read books, dont backtest,dont listen to anybody,just keep on clicking.. Zero chance with that attitude he gets 5 nanoseconds of an MD's time,other than for shits and giggles.. Its not callous,its a fact....Get an interview with the head of derivatives at GS and enlighten him on your infinite gamma theory.. Keep in mind,you called him an amatuer.not me
market making is a good business model. maybe their closing auction is combinatorial to optimize on max volume thus more $
What in your eyes, we are professionals? LOL This is what you think of us, stop pretending. Why would I go to Goldman Sachs to get my theory validated? LOL If I really have the money to commission a study on my infinite gamma phenomenon, I would approach an academic institute for it, not a rogue financial company that throws its peers under the bus to save its own skin during crisis time and commits fraud for profit. Not me blathering, these are well published facts.
Why do you care what I think?? Amusing how a self proclaimed amateur rants on about GS.. Jealous much??
They get audited. It’s not some criminal conspiracy. They get rebated for giving flow to the exchange, so whatever they can’t pair off they attempt to be a liquidity provider and I’m sure based on research it’s a long end profitable investment for them. Secondly they have a prop arm and they aggregate your data and share your retail metadata to their prop guys and they learn what you’re doing. It’s a great way for them to get insight for basically no cost.
I don't but stop pretending that you don't think of us as amateurs and somehow not "worthy" of a "prestigious" firm like Goldman Sachs. If you have the guts to say it, at least have the guts to admit it. LOL What do you care what I am? LOL And besides, it's not ranting. It's speaking the truth about Goldman Sachs. Ah yes, very jealous... LOL
ok nothing different from those market maker or I call casino brokers in retail forex. I was right. It's much better off paying a bit more to send orders directly to exchanges instead of saving 0.0015 per share to send orders to citadel.
I dont think of you as an amateur,thats how you labeled yourself. However, I think SML is an intentional troll,and you are here to prove your points,regardless how absurd they are. Infinite Gamma is a perfect example. As an ex Managing Director on Wall Street,I would would say with 99.9 percent certainty you are not "worthy" of landing a spot on a trading desk,and certianly not a Goldman Sachs Has nothing to do with your self proclaimed amateur status,it has everything to do with your attitude... In your words it's an " amateur act"