Libtards and MSM pissed that Bush wouldn't let them warn terrorists!

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by TGregg, Aug 10, 2006.

  1. TGregg

    TGregg

    Another blow against terror is bad news for democrats and bad news for the mainsleeze media. So naturally they are pissed off.

    http://newsbusters.org/node/6895
     
  2. TGregg

    TGregg

    Gee, why didn't the administration share the details of an investigation in progress with the people who have shown absoutely zero reluctance to publish everything (including lies) to help the terrorists?

    I bet even Gomer Pyle could figure that one out. But not the libards!
     
  3. The most likely explanation is the Brits kept it on a need to know basis and cut the CIA and the Valery Plames at Langley off from the info. Otherwise, I am sure some Clinton leftover at CIA would have made sure it was on the front page of the Washington Post or NY Times in plenty of time for the terrorists to escape.
     
  4. Pabst

    Pabst


    The readers who post on newsbusters.org are my kind of guys TGregg!
     
  5. The Post and the Times must just be fuming....a chance to help the terrorists foiled!

    The horror....the horror....those damn fascist Brits!