You do realize that Banks and Insurance companies are desperately trying to hire IT staff with AI knowledge. These companies don't have a "dev team in place" whatsoever to deal with an AI future. Tech companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, etc. all have AI teams in place (and are expanding). The companies who will be the primary users and integrators of AI for direct business productivity are significantly short staffed for the future. Even purchased AI products require significant configuration to be useful in the corporate workplace
Yes, I am fully aware of pretty much everything that is going on in AI. As I previously mentioned, deploying AI effectively within an enterprise environment, especially for public companies navigating the regs of the financial sector, presents a distinct set of complex challenges. However, the most challenging problems are currently the focus of intense development and competition among numerous specialized companies. It is a race in which the first effective solution stands to gain substantial market share and the trophy is potentially winner-takes-most. After these are solved, development and deployment becomes much easier.
Your response scans at 93% likely as being AI generated. Using AI does not make you an expert on deploying AI in a business environment.
Noticed it too, It’s got that overly balanced cadence and safe corporate phrasing that smells synthetic. Feels like someone trying to project gravitas by regurgitating Gartner-speak.
You can believe anything that you want. It is sad that more people don't understand what is coming. Wake up! We are in the AI revolution. It is really just starting now. Shocking!!! Breaking news!!! People in AI use AI. Fucking mind blowing. No one could have seen this coming. No one. Yeah, businesses absolutely hate cheaper, faster, more revenue, 24/7 employees with no breaks, and unlimited scalability. What was I thinking? No company would want that. No ADA. No breaks. No vacations. No complaining. You are clearly correct. No companies will adopt that. That is retarded to even think that any company would do that.
Well, after a long day on ET reading the confident, enthusiastic posts of people blissfully unaware they’re morons, I like to kick back with a delicious Dejamu yogurt. What are the odds that tomorrow someone will announce something blindingly obvious, as if no one else has ever considered it at a more broadly experienced level?
Sorry but this doesn't even rate compared to when PCs and the Internet first became usable in terms of changing the world. Hell, even outsourcing was supposed to kill the IT business in NA at one point. Did it ?
Okay, we will see. You can stay willfully blind if you want. Go tell the researchers and analyst at McKinsey that they don't know what they are talking about and set them straight. BTW- McKinsey’s 30% estimate was run on GPT-4-level capabilities. - Computer & Dot-Com Era (1960s-2000s): Silicon chips digitized information and the internet connected the globe → clerical, calculative, and logistics work transformed. - AI age: replaces decisions themselves. Once software can learn, reason, and act, the ceiling on disruption disappears. Current AI models only simulate reasoning. They are very convincing and it feels a lot like reasoning and it will probably trick 95% of people into believing it is reasoning. But, it is not genuine reasoning. That is in the near future. This is a big "but"; there are emergent properties that we have no idea why or how they are happening. 30% - 50% of current jobs will disappear most likely by the end of 2030. For example, all of these jobs are gone relatively soon and will never come back: - data entry - customer service - bookkeeping - scheduling However, I do not believe that the current transformer/token architecture is capable of achieving SGAI. There is a fundamental flaw in the token-based representation, which inherently limits its ability to achieve true superintelligent general artificial intelligence. There are very few people aware of this flaw.