Wow! Nailed that one, I guess. Though as far as I know Tourettes doesn't make you type things you didn't want to type. I brought up my view on abortion conflicting with the Libertarian party as an example of how there is no such thing as a pure Libertarian (or if there is, I've not met one). Then you went off into God and tornadoes....Libertarian math...whatever that is.
Reading comprehension problems as well, I see. I've said this numerous times before. Just don't claim that a position that is against the LP is actually part of it.
not sure where you ever got that idea. I never claimed the libertarian party supports food stamps. I think I said I am a libertarian but am a big believer in food stamps, go look it up
Actually, it's rather difficult to follow anything you talk about as you are all over the map on a broad range of issues, including whether you are even Libertarian or not.
back then you were demanding that a person had to be pure, now you have changed and admitted that in reality no one is totally pure. Make up your mind. If you are going back to demanding I be pure, then no, according to you, I am not a libertarian and never want to be one.
I think you made numerous claims that I couldn't possibly be a libertarian if I was in favor of eliminating means testing for food stamps
sorry sorry, I think I accidently pm'd you. I meant to post, so I will try to repeat what I wrote. This whole libertarian argument started when I didn't realize you were doing a DB cut and paste. I mistakenly thought you were posting your own opinion. I took issue with the comment, "I think most libertarians are against people eating bad food." As a libertarian, I don't give a shit what people eat, and I don't think any human being is qualified to decide what "bad food" is, although Michelle tries because some people don't have a college education like she does.