TANGIBLE INTEREST gets you a COLB,which Obama has received released to the public AMT. The Hawaiian health dept and previous (Republican ) Governor have verified to the public that Obama was born there AMT
1961 Hawaii had LONG FORMS and WE ALL KNOW THAT FOR A FACT! Barry has TANGIBLE INTEREST to review his held LONG FORM at anytime........PERIOD! "TALK is paid in pennies, ACTION is paid in GOLD" So go get it barry.....the most powerful man on Earth.....go get YOUR OWN LONG FORM that you have ALREADY (and others) admitted exists......GO GET IT!!! :eek:
In 1961 Hawaii issued long forms.In 2010 Hawaii issues COLB's According to Hawaii's Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo, the state began issuing only "certifications of live birth" in 2001
I have been explaining the same thing on this website for over a year now. so far all we have seen is cases being thrown out on procedural grounds. But, I warned you that some states will not let Barry on their ballot without proof of birth place or maybe even natural born citizenship. If HI really has the proof Barry needs it will all be taken care of Subpoena. When HIgets a subpoena for the original info it will most likely produce the document and supporting info or claim it is lost. --- within weeks texas and a few other states will require proof of natural born citizenship to be on the ballot in their states. when Obama cant get on the ballot, he will have a choice... subpoena the original, or sue the state for entrance onto the ballot claiming the matter is covered by Federal Election law. The eventual outcome will likely end in the U.S. Supreme court. I doubt the court will be throwing that case out on procedural grounds because if they do, it will most likely be Obama's appeal being thrown out.
Col Terry Linkin's attorneys probably told him the same thing If the Federal government says that Hawaii's COLB "contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate.",You should know how the Supreme Court will react when a States says that a document that is good enough for the federal government is not good enough for a State.There is also that federal law that requires all states to accept other states official documents Okubo also emphasized the certification form "contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate. You should also know how the Supreme Court will react to a State not recognizing a document that the Supreme Court itself recognizes She added that the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state's current certification of live birth "as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements."
That is not true jem Hollister v. Soetoro On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, John Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass".[180] The district court ultimately reprimanded Hemenway for his actions, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the case and Hemenway's reprimand. --- Rhodes v. Macdonald In September 2009, Taitz, on behalf of Captain Connie Rhodes, a U.S. Army physician, sought a restraining order to stop Rhodes' forthcoming deployment to Iraq. In the request for a restraining order, Taitz argued the order was illegal since Obama was illegally serving as President. On September 16, federal judge Clay D. Land rejected the motion and denounced it as frivolous.
Yet with all the birther cases from federal court,to military court to The Supreme court it has never been subpoenaed The guy who probably has the best chance to subpoena the original says that he wont.I can certainly understand him not wanting to be associated with the birthers.(Or maybe he's in on the conspiracy ) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/18/AR2010121803396.html With new influence, Issa recasts self as Washington's whistleblower By Philip Rucker Washington Post Staff Writer Rep. Darrell Issa is finally getting what he has long craved: subpoena power. From his new perch atop the committee responsible for oversight investigations, the California Republican will be able to demand any document he wishes and summon anybody to appear before him - no small thing for a man who recently referred to President Obama as "one of the most corrupt presidents in modern times." Even so, there's one thing Issa says he won't subpoena: Barack Obama's birth certificate. "Mine is not the committee that asks where the president was born," Issa said in an interview. "It doesn't ask what ministers that he went to think. All that stuff is a distraction. I'm not the overseer of the president."