No doubt each time you see Obama, your first thought is: "There's that half white guy." Of course it is...
I bet you cant wait to pull out your Obama doll in 2012 <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bky2SGrmC8g?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bky2SGrmC8g?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
You're a complete moron. In 2011, there will be more Republican minorities holding governorships, Senate seats and representing majority-white House districts than Democrats.
Next, Range Rover will claim (like all the other media lackeys) that Bush didn't veto the Medicare end of life counseling law.
Creative wording to not mention all the minority democrats Do a full comparison. How many total minority congressmen are there for each party ?
Senator Jesse Helms (Republican of North Carolina) led opposition to the (MLK )bill and questioned whether King was important enough to receive such an honor. Sen. John McCain (Republican of Arizona/2008 GOP Presidential nominee)voted against the creation of the holiday to honor King, and later defended Arizona Republican Governor Evan Mecham's rescission of the state holiday in honor of King created by his Democratic predecessor
If the the birther lawyer brought the case in a court without any jurisdiction it would be frivolous. If the issue was not ripe. If the plaintiff was not a proper party or did not have standing to sue. A court would throw the case out and might even grand stand a little. From what I read that is exactly what happened with cases you keep bringing up. No judge ever found that Obama was a natural born citizen and from what I can tell, Obama never presented evidence on that issue of his place of birth. So stop acting like you know something about how a future court will rule. You do not even know what evidence Obama will produce if has to sue his way on to the ballot in a state like texas. Since we do not know the evidence we do not know how the court will rule . Perhaps Obama can prove he was born in HI and that he is a natural born citizen... but only obamaloons state they know where he was born.
"So stop acting like you know something about how a future court will rule." So will you stop acting as if Obama is not the duly elected president? You look around and see the bodies of state, local, and federal government as well as the courts that are satisfied...then look to the nut-jobs that are not satisfied...and apply a little common sense. Your focus on "a lack of proper evidence" represents a small and unsuccessful minority of people. Additionally, a "lack of proper evidence" in their opinion, is not evidence of a lack of sufficient evidence to establish Obama's presidency.