When I said taking care of the underprivileged, I specifically meant healthcare which was continued from previous posts. How am I suppose to infer that you were not talking about healthcare when others were specifically discussing healthcare since the last few posts.
This thread is like a double orgasm for the klannish... They get to try and blame liberals for all the problems, and they get to hate on the blacks... Two of their most favorite things to do...
How can you be confused..that was made perfectly clear in the original article. The real question that should be asked is why have blacks not asked themselves why they're voting for liberals. What have the got to show for it?
One thing I haven't seen one liberal present (unless I missed it) is statistical examples of how liberal programs have helped blacks that refute what the author is presenting. The only argument is to deflect the blame onto republicans. Why? To hide the facts of course.
Many urbanized blacks and rural whites need to clean up their own house. For the underprivileged, school is free, food is nearly free, housing can be subsidized, and if they have children the wealth of others is redistributed to them for no other reason than they exist. The nanny state is not about help. It is about power. If the nanny state, and its political mouthpieces don't keep the people dependent on them, then they serve no purpose. The beaurocracy behind the nanny state is ENORMOUS, and they have no plans on dismantling it.