Leveraged Short ETFs... something wrong?

Discussion in 'ETFs' started by gnome, Jan 4, 2009.

  1. What I was saying is, they perform pretty much as they're supposed to on a daily basis which is what they're designed for. But their long term "performance" is a mechanical consequence of the daily tracking and it is what it is.

    Which means that if SP500 is up 10% in one month SDS's price will depend on the unique path SP500 took that month to get there and could vary wildly given different paths to the same end point
     
    #31     Jan 6, 2009
  2. fixed :D
     
    #32     Jan 6, 2009
  3. Wrong. Playing SDS against SPY could easily blow up if played longer term for the simple reason that SDS's price after X days depends on the unique path SP500 takes over those X days while the price of SPY after X days does not, only the endpoint matters.

    I've been talking longer term, his question said nothing about not trading longer term and this thread isn't about arbitraging fleeting inefficiencies.

    For someone who can spew trivia about ETFs you don't know shit about trading them
     
    #33     Jan 6, 2009
  4. spy= +1%
    sds= -2%
    sso= +2% 10000$ SPY = 5000$ SDS

    10000$ SPY = 5000$ SSO

    it is simple math plus ETFs expenses ratios and dividends
     
    #34     Jan 6, 2009
  5. If that's over one day yes. If not then only by a fluke.
     
    #35     Jan 6, 2009
  6. fixed :D
     
    #36     Jan 6, 2009
  7. P.S. Real life example.

    Contrary to what winstontj wrote, this is NOT "spot on."

    Had you put this on with the 1x (IYF) and -2x (SKF) ETFs that track the Dow Jones U.S. Financials index over the period leading into Nov 20 and held, it would have failed spectacularly.

    This is such a glaring example it's obvious from just looking at the prices without actually calculating the loss.


     
    #37     Jan 6, 2009
  8. I think the original poster on this was addressing a misconception many of us had. When I was looking to take advantage of what I thought would be a drop in in oil from $135 I bought DUG at $27.50 as I had read several articles recommending it as a " safe" play on a drop in oil prices for those not wanting to short oil futures. I got out shortly after with a slight profit as I soon realized my mistake after watching it's correlation to energy stocks more than oil. Kicked myself in the arse when it ran up another 100%, but .... that's trading. DIG / DUG is not a play on oil.
     
    #38     Jan 6, 2009
  9. gnome

    gnome

    My perception is that DIG correlates reasonably as it should, DUG does not...
     
    #39     Jan 6, 2009
  10. Thanks guys for all of your input. Very insightful. This concept of price correlation dependent upon the "path" of the particular underlying instrument is quite interesting. I will have to look into this more.

    AZD
     
    #40     Jan 6, 2009