Let's liberate Syria

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Oct 5, 2003.

  1. Syria is EVIL, plain and simple... it is the moral obligation of the American military to defend its ally Israel from the EVIL of Syria... I say redeploy some troops from Iraq in order to attack Syria...

    God Bless America and Israel in the battle against EVIL...
     
    #11     Oct 10, 2003
  2. If Syria continues with its support of terrorism against Israel, we should support Israel in her use of tactical nukes... God Bless Israel and USA...
     
    #12     Oct 12, 2003
  3. You guys don't know nothing about War and politics.

    What makes you think US dares to attack. Iran has been
    helping American enemies for 25years, and US knew about
    them.

    Iran will put USA in deep shit if they attack.
    Don't forget that Iraq was backed up by
    whole whole world including Arab world
    both militry wise and financialy, when they
    were fighting against Iran.

    Iraq was even using Chemical Gas against iran
    given by western, and no coutry condemn them.

    I am not saying US can't defeat Iran, but you require
    three time more soldiers. Don't forget that Iran is a
    mountainous country and not easy to move around
    and very easy to hid for Anti-Americans.

    Don't forget that Iran is sharing very long long borders
    with Afganistan, Pakistan, Russian states, Iraq, Turkey.
    Anti-Americans will be coming inside from every angle.

    Iran 75 million poupolation, Iraq 22 Million only.
    Tehran 18 Million people. Baghdad is 5 Million only.

    How you expect US to control Iran? Explain please?
    A nuclear bomb from US might do only.
    .:confused: :confused:
     
    #13     Oct 12, 2003
  4. Btw you have got more than 3 to 4 million Iranian
    Americans spreaded all over USA. Did you know
    for example Tennis Player Andrea Aggasi is an Iranian?

    Let US go to war against Syria for now, But Iran trough
    peacfull economical and political agreement only.

    Take care
     
    #14     Oct 12, 2003
  5. msfe

    msfe

    Israel deploys nuclear arms in submarines

    Peter Beaumont in London and Conal Urquhart in Jerusalem
    Sunday October 12, 2003

    Israeli and American officials have admitted collaborating to deploy US-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads in Israel's fleet of Dolphin-class submarines, giving the Middle East's only nuclear power the ability to strike at any of its Arab neighbours.

    The unprecedented disclosure came as Israel announced that states 'harbouring terrorists' are legitimate targets, responding to Syria's declaration of its right to self-defence should Israel bomb its territory again.

    According to Israeli and Bush administration officials interviewed by the Los Angeles Times, the sea-launch capability gives Israel the ability to target Iran more easily should the Iranians develop their own nuclear weapons.

    Although it has been long suspected that Israel bought three German diesel-electric submarines with the specific aim of arming them with nuclear cruise missiles, the admission that the two countries had collaborated in arming the fleet with a nuclear-capable weapons system is significant at a time of growing crisis between Israel and its neighbours.

    According to the paper, the disclosure by two US officials is designed to discourage Israel's enemies from against launching an attack amid rapidly escalating tensions in the region following a raid by Israeli jets on an alleged terrorist training camp near the Syrian capital, Damascus.

    In a clear echo of the Bush doctrine of pre-emption, the Foreign Ministry's senior spokesman, Gideon Meir, insisted: 'Israel views every state that is harbouring terrorist organisations and the leaders of those terrorist organisations who are attacking innocent citizens of the state of Israel as legitimate targets out of self defence.'

    The disclosure, is certain to complicate UN-led efforts to persuade Iran to make a full disclosure of its nuclear programme. It will also complicate the Bush administration's efforts to reach out to moderate Arab states when they are pressing for an equal disclosure of Israel's nuclear weapons programme.

    Although Israel has long been known to possess nuclear weapons, in the past it has abided by a deal struck with President Richard Nixon in 1969 that it would maintain 'ambiguity' about its retention of weapons in exchange for the US turning a blind eye. According to reliable estimates, Israel has around 200 nuclear warheads.

    It acquired the three Dolphin class submarines, which can remain at sea for a month, in the late Nineties. They are equipped with six torpedo tubes suitable for the 21-inch torpedoes that are normally used on most submarines.

    It had been understood they would carry a version of the 'Popeye Turbo' cruise missiles being developed by Rafael Armament Development Authority of Israel.

    Israel's seaborne nuclear doctrine is designed to place one submarine in the Persian Gulf, the other in the Mediterranean, with a third on standby. Secret test launches of the cruise missile systems were understood to have been undertaken in May 2000 when Israel carried out tests in the Indian Ocean.

    'We tolerate nuclear weapons in Israel for the same reason we tolerate them in Britain and France,' one of the LA Times' sources told the paper. 'We don't regard Israel as a threat.'

    Despite the anonymity of the source, the sentiment is almost identical to that of the US Under Secretary of State for Arms Control, John Bolton, who told British journalists last week that America was not interested in taking Israel to task for its continuing development of nuclear weapons because it was not a 'threat' to the United States.

    Even if Bolton was not one of the sources for the story, his comments, coming on top of that of the two other sources, suggest the degree to which senior members of the Bush administration can now not even be bothered to hide America's assistance and encouragement for Israel's nuclear programme.
     
    #15     Oct 12, 2003
  6. According to Israeli and Bush administration officials interviewed by the Los Angeles Times, the sea-launch capability gives Israel the ability to target Iran more easily should the Iranians develop their own nuclear weapons.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    These are nothing more than just treats in todays modern civilized world.
    I don't think any country would use it against other, since other will retaliate with the same.
     
    #16     Oct 12, 2003
  7. If the Iranian terrorists develop weapons of mass destruction, we reserve the right to nuke Tehran in order to protect the Civilized World... God Bless Israel and America in the War against the Evil Ones...
     
    #17     Oct 12, 2003
  8. Who are these Iranian terrorist you refering to? It is the Iranian
    government who are building nuclear bombs.

    Now don't tell me you will bomb Tehran because they have
    Atomic power, even they never us it against you.

    US government has the history of bombing Hiroshima and
    Nakasaki twice with less powerfull atomic power then.

    Now with such a background US has, and many other countries
    like Russia, north korea, pakistan, Isreal, India, china has similar
    power. Why Iranian should not have?

    Candletrader, I belive you have just a childish aggressor attitude like your COWBOY president, who think world should go his way
    (not even American way).
     
    #18     Oct 12, 2003
  9. Who knows? For 40 years you couldn't be sure...
    Too sad a new nuclear brinkmanship seems to develop in the mid-east.

    btw, DER SPIEGEL (a very influential German newsmagazine) reports that Israel is working on plans to destroy atomic facilities in Iran with a dozen or so F-16's. Sharon seems to have gone wild...
     
    #19     Oct 12, 2003
  10. Isreal will never be permited to do such act becasue in this case:

    -Iran will go to directly support hezbolla and bust isreal.
    -Iranian are Shiate people, as well 60% of Iraqi, and Iran
    has direct influance in Iraq even now and never let Americans
    rebuild Iraq their way.
    -Iranian Have Shahab missles that can lunch even Europe, forget
    Isreal.
    -Iranian have some differnances with Arabs, and it will make them
    more united only.



    Btw Iranian don't even have to build nuclear, They can buy from their allies if they need to.
     
    #20     Oct 12, 2003