You always look like a loser in the debate with me. Of course, that's not an insult....nah....no way...of course not. Bwahahahahahaha. __________________________ Where did I say I was skilled at debating? You know what I believe? LOL. Once again, you are putting words (text) in other people's mouths (threads) if you make such a claim. I have no need to claim one way or the other on this matter. Who reads chit chat and thinks: "He is a really good debater." Not me, but if it cracks your cheeks, by all means smile, smile, smile. __________________________ Here is a hint for you, I will make the letters really big so you can read them, so if you get confused again, you can refer back to this post: CHIT CHAT IS NOT THE REAL WORLD. So go ahead, keep practicing your "real world $300.00 per hour opinion generating stuff."
Just for you, we will add aztec, egyptian, hawaiian, greek and norse versions of creation to the biology course. As for your opinion that Z has has cleaned my clock, well, maybe so, but he still needs to clean my toilets and pull weeds if he wants to get paid. You may help him if you need the money. I can probably spare a pair of old tennis shoes and coat, too.
LOL ! you really have no clue. perhaps Zzzzzz lives in a $14 mill manse overlooking the pacific in southern CA.... your inability to answer the initial question posed and avoidance of same is indicative of your faulty thought process. the above beliefs all have a common thread--- the thread of a CREATION. no need to teach specifics, since specifics are unknown at this time, stop avoiding the underlying theme of a CREATOR by mixing diverse cultural, demographic interpretations of same. hank
Yeah, Kent, whats'amatterwithyou?! Just teach CREATION... no need for proof or "specifics" because there isn't any. ROFLMAO!!
Oh STU -- did you wince in pain and embarrassment when you read the previous quote on this thread. Mr. -- "Creator" in the declaration of idependance could mean quantum flux and Jefferson was a deist at best. 03-03-05 06:02 AM From your link to Jefferson's writings: THE MORALS OF JESUS To Dr. Benjamin Rush, with a Syllabus Washington, Apr. 21, 1803 DEAR SIR, -- In some of the delightful conversations with you, in the evenings of 1798-99, and which served as an anodyne to the afflictions of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Christian religion was sometimes our topic; and I then promised you, that one day or other, would give you my views of it. They are the result of a life of inquiry & reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing ofmy opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other. At the short intervals since these
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/A...9/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/103-4425777-4431010 page 58 look it up....and yes i did take my time to copy it from the book....crazy i tell ya...crazyyyyyyyyy.....
Uh JEM -- No. Why would I? Thomas Jefferson's letter to William Short August 4 1820 explaining his reasons for the letter and Syllabus to Dr Rush... My aim in that was, to justify the character of Jesus against the fictions of his pseudo-followers, which have exposed him to the inference of being an impostor. For if we could believe that he really countenanced the follies, the falsehoods and the charlatanisms which his biographers father on him, and admit the misconstructions, interpolations and theorizations of the fathers of the early, and fanatics of the latter ages, the conclusion would be irresistible by every sound mind, that he was an impostor. I give no credit to their falsifications of his actions and doctrines, and to rescue his character, the postulate in my letter asked only what is granted in reading every other historian.... That Jesus did not mean to impose himself on mankind as the son of God, physically speaking, I have been convinced by the writings of men more learned than myself in that lore. Get over it JEM. You are here for a brief period by no other better reason than a quantum fart in a vacuum