Either way, you are not the person who determines who wins or looses a debate on chit chat. This is just too damn easy, but thanks anyway.
I am that person and, yes, you lost the debate (badly) a little advice: get smthg other than a LIBERAL ARTS education. (Oh, and see the wizard, strawman
No problem. By the way. You've also lost your gentleman's bet. Of course, I have no doubt that you won't acknowledge this, but that's ok. You really should look into a formal debate class. It will make you a much more interesting opponent. I'm fairly certain that you won't like being bested by a classroom full of 19 year olds, and that should serve to motivate you to support your arguments with some facts worth debating. You write so much stuff, but it's all so boring. No information transfer, just bare, unsupported conclusions. At least El Cubano and Doubter post some facts to back up their positions. Don't you get tired of never learning anything? I would.
I lost no such bet. There was no time frame put on the bet. It was open ended, I couldn't lose. Now you are telling me what I should or shouldn't do? Let me see: 1. You present your side of an argument. 2. You decide whether or not the other side of the argument is valid or not. 3. You declare yourself the winner. 4. You tell other people what they should and shouldn't do. You really are a beauty. LOL. "You write so much stuff, but it's all so boring. No information transfer, just bare, unsupported conclusions. At least El Cubano and Doubter post some facts to back up their positions." What can be said about someone who incessantly reads stuff he finds boring (when he could be paid $300 per hour for his opinions)? There is a term for such a person....
I was just trying to help. When you attack me personally, it just makes you look like a loser to everyone else. Of course, you always look like a loser to me. And, by the way, in your previous post, you used "looses" where you should have used "loses." It's one thing to misspell a word, and quite another to use it incorrectly (just as you used the possessive "attorney's" in place of the plural "attorneys" yesterday). Maybe you should also look into English Composition or perhaps Remedial English. That will definitely give you a leg up on those 19 year olds.
______________________________________________ I certainly won't argue with the frailty of the human species. Either with design flaws or counterproductive mutations there could be stronger longer lived humans. If we have evolved and we are so frail then maybe the survival of the fittest for a criteria of evolution is in question. Also why did we evolve away from a protective coat. Apes had them my dog has one. Having a covering isn't only required for decency but the winters demand one (my dog does fine at -20 in his birthday suit but I suffer a little). However Genesis has an explanantion for why we need coverings and it fits better than the evolving model. It would also lead me to believe that we are not the same today as when we were created, maybe we devolved within species of course. 100 years is probably longer in the life of a man that 3000 years is in the life of God.
When you declared your deceitful intent, the bet ended. In any case, I didn't insult you. I just said that you always look like a loser in the debate to me. That's because you never present any facts to support your positions. I think it's rather sad that you believe that you are skilled at debating. There's no judge or panel here, so you can work your circular reasoning. But I know, and what's more YOU know, that the shit you sling wouldn't hold up in the real world. Whereas, I've had practice making sure that my argument is supported by facts, so I know my shit will hold up. Anyway, you have a great weekend.
you have become quite the true believer. pray tell, what does witchcraft, alchemy, astrology, numerology, et al teach us about the begining of time? zzzz has cleaned your clock, go back to your cubicle. peace out