The thread entitled "dogmatic evolutionists---the neofanatics" was closed because of the unveiled animosity among the posters in their exchanges. Further, it seemed to me that the thread was essentially going nowhere. Most respondents (although not all) showed very little inclination to actually consider the views of the "other side." I do not count myself among the innocent. A subsequent thread, entitled "Dog Eared Designists. Part 2," appears to be headed along the same path. Let us take a moment to learn from our mistakes and go about this sort of dialogue in the right way. Let us now hear from the creationists. I ask that you kindly share your evidence of Intelligent Design. However, I ask that the evidence be of the same standard that you expected to obtain from evolutionists in support of their views. Anything short of the same standard subjects an otherwise meaningful analysis to bias. Although I personally support the view of evolutionists, I implore like minded people to show forbearance and restraint as the creationists make their case. Then, a more meaningful exchange between viewpoints can follow. In the above noted closed thread, at least one respondent who sided with creationists advised that he could present a case for Intelligent Design but that the forum in question was not the appropriate one. Well, this forum right here is the appropriate one because it was created for just that purpose. I await your input.