Let me tell you a little bit about Ron Paul

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Maverick74, Dec 10, 2007.

  1. if anyone wants it, i paged back and saved the first page of the deleted rp thread

    i'm sure there's a simple explanation. dunno about anyone else but this is at least the fourth time i've seen a good thread dissapear in the last few months. one was anti-fed at the outset of the credit contagion on a really bad down day, another was a uk independent piece by robert fisk on the official 911 story, third one was an NPR marketplace researcher soliciting reasons for high oil prices
     
    #111     Dec 13, 2007
  2. There is an element of censorship here at ET. That is for sure.
     
    #112     Dec 13, 2007
  3. Oh, I see now. The fire chief is in on the CIA/Mossad conspiracy but instead of blowing the building up he discusses it with private citizen Silverstein. Cause that's what government conspirators always do, they spill their guts to Larry Silverstein, don't they.

    Silverstein (being a life-long developer and a billionaire) is dumb enough to ask questions about the explosives in the building and dumb enough to keep his mouth shut during the interview. Having secured Silverstein's approval, the conspirators bring down the building via controlled demolition... because they don't want it to look like controlled demolition, they want it to look like the result of the terror attack.

    LOL, what a ridiculous theory, it makes even less sense than the nonsense about Silverstein being in on it that Ratboy has been spewing for years. Try again detective.
     
    #113     Dec 13, 2007

  4. dddooo is a Canadian AIPAC disinformation agent.

    I can send you the dossier I have compiled on him.
     
    #114     Dec 13, 2007
  5. Who says that even the Fire Chief is in on it? How do you know he is not just following orders? What if he is relying on someone else's expertise and then just putting his seal of approval on it? What if the order came from above? Is he going to question it? History & studies tell us 80-90% of people would not.

    What is Larry Silverstein supposed to do? Why would he question anything the fire chief tells him? Two of his buildings just collapsed and the third is on fire. The chief calls him and tells him that they gotta "pull it". Anyone's reaction at that time & place would be "Do what you gotta do". That's it.

    I don't even know why I am replying to you, I guess it's comical & interesting to me just how your argument keeps degenerating and how your brain is unable to accept certain concepts.
    A look at Iran/Contra shows exactly how schemes like this are pulled off. Congress was faced with information from the start, almost all of them just stuck their head in the sand on instinct. It has been conditioned in today's society.
     
    #115     Dec 13, 2007
  6. What's the requirement for such a job, IQ below 85?
     
    #116     Dec 13, 2007


  7. Who says that even the Fire Chief is in on it? How do you know he is not just following orders?
    Oh I see, the Fire Chief is NOT in on a huge extremely secretive government conspiracy to kill thousands of americans but they order him of all people to demolish the building, moreover he is allowed to call Silverstein on an unsecured line and discuss it. Please, please tell me what you're smoking.

    Is he going to question it? History & studies tell us 80-90% of people would not.
    OMG, the conspirators are killing thousands of americans, they just killed 400 fire fighters and they employ the fire chief (which is totally unnecessary) hoping that he won't tell on them. I can't believe anyone could come up with this kind of nonsense.

    The chief calls him and tells him that they gotta "pull it". Anyone's reaction at that time & place would be "Do what you gotta do". That's it.
    LOL, now you're trying to rewrite the history. Here is the original quote:

    Silverstein: "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

    See dummy, Silverstein told them to "pull it" not the other way around as you just lied. The whole conspiracy revolves around this one fact. Nice try, no cigar.
     
    #117     Dec 13, 2007
  8. so doodoo... is Huckleberry still your uber candidate? you rawk doodoo... talk about pickin a winner. LMAOOOOOOOOO
     
    #118     Dec 13, 2007
  9. LOL, he is not my candidate, I anticipated his rise when he was at the very bottom where Ron Paul is today but Huck is not my guy, I rarely vote republican to begin with and I could not care less whether it's going to be Huck, Romney, Rudy or even McCain.

    Nevertheless as far as Huckabee and my winner picking abilities are concerned - he lost over 100 pounds over the course of a year (leftmost image), he has double-digit lead in Iowa and is leading in some national polls.

    12/13/2007
    Giuliani 19%
    Huckabee 23%
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...2/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history



    He did a great job losing weight (yeah, that's him on the left), I did great predicting his rise. You should be proud too though, your guy Paul is ahead of Alan Keys.

    [​IMG]

    More importantly though, Hydroblunt has completely destroyed your conspiracy theory that Silverstein was in on it. What do you think about that?
     
    #119     Dec 13, 2007
  10. I didn't assume...you told me straight up.

    Were you lying?

    Are you or are you not a Grape Framer?

    Fess up damn you! :D


     
    #120     Dec 13, 2007