Speak softly and carry a .50 BMG, perhaps? She is a good girl as well as playful and affectionate. However, I'm suprised we lasted past December because we have very different outlooks. Ironically, she was a Sanders supporter who is now having a more favorable view of Trump (Free money) and I was a Trump supporter who is having a more favorable view of Sanders! (What's the difference between the both of them).
I like your thinking behind why I chose that handle and there is a tiny bit of that behind my decision to use that name. The big reason I went with that handle was for anti-quoting purposes in other Social Media outlets, on the idea that the potential quoter should make the most effort in thinking for themselves. Someone who liked my idea may feel uncomfortable with using my handle and would probably would also be uncomfortable in copying what I wrote exactly. The act of rewording what I said could stimulate new ideas by the would be quoter, potentially creating a more robust idea or argument. Receiving a citation or credit for my ideas or analysis was and is not my highest priority.
Although the Millennials tend to be met with derision by other generations, there are some individuals are very impressive respresentatives for the Millennials. The Corona Virus may end up being a much needed emotional and character "Slap on the bottom" as they face emotional and economic hardship beyond what some Millennials realized was possible. Older generations with their experience and hopefully, wisdom, would serve well in an advisory type role in politics, but leaving the ultimate decision making to the mentally agile and those who may feel the impact the longest.
Just remember that free money is your own money. The corporations getting grants, they are getting free money. And Trump is among many awful things a child rapist, nothing can erase that in the minds of fathers with daughters.
I do know how to say this more diplomatically, but in this case that is not warranted. Think about what you have written. It is incredibly stupid and self-defeating.
Tongue in check, my friend, tongue in cheek. To be diplomatic, unbelievably diplomatic, neither Presidential candidate represents the hopes of the majority of people. To fervently support one of the Preseidential candidates over the other seems silly to me. This is why I'm going to focus on those issues that affect the interests of the majority. Looking forward to lively discussions with you on those issues.
If you are putting your future financial well being in the hands of anyone being elected President then you are fucked and get what you deserve in a way. HRC and Trump supporters both learned that...
You see one candidate having a mental health advantage over the other? It is no longer April 1st. One candidate in a career establishment politician who has made millions from an active war machine, apparently thinks the military of our rivals are like it was In the '50's, and has impulse control issues as shown by his recent interactions with voters. Can you think of any geopolitical issues that this candidate would bring if elected? As in a costly and dangerous war that could very well escalate beyond what we could deal with? Also, that candidate is not nearly as mentally agile the other candidate. The other candidate seems to think the universe revolves around him most of the time and can't help himself even when he should be sensing the world is looking for leadership from the US during a crisis, not cringe-worthy self aggrandizement. At least the other candidate has avoided escalating conflicts so far. I'm done with comparing or talking about Presidential candidates that are far from viable from a leadership perspective. Time to move on and pursue viable subjects.