Let it Rip - Don't argue with anti-vaxx, snakeoil peddling MAGAtards

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Jul 31, 2021.

  1. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    44 of the 63 studies on IvMmeta.com are peer reviewed showing IVM is positive for treating COVID. Either prophylactically or as early treatment.
    Including this one…
    Keep watching your vaccines fail and natural immunity reign supreme!
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2021
    #251     Aug 27, 2021
  2. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    LOL, so you have given defending the so called peer reviewed study and now back to your original gish gallop of 63 studies?

    This must be so embarrassing for you, congrats on another surrender.

    And if natural immunity will reign, why do you need horse dewormers?
     
    #252     Aug 27, 2021
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    44 are peer reviewed? LOL

    Not a single study of these 63 is peer reviewed by a major medical journal.
     
    #253     Aug 27, 2021
  4. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    I don’t have to defend it. It’s been peer reviewed! That’s the defense. The result is positive. 44 out of the 63 are peer reviewed and meta analysis shows very positive results.

    Hope you don’t have to take antibiotics one day - that’s what they use in cows!
    Stupid Arts major moron.
     
    #254     Aug 27, 2021
  5. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    LOL. 44 are peer reviewed. No matter what goalposts your try to rearrange in front of them.
     
    #255     Aug 27, 2021
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    No -- 44 are not peer reviewed.

    Please list the 44 you claim are peer reviewed to support your claim.

    Otherwise we will acknowledge your claim is completely false.
     
    #256     Aug 27, 2021
  7. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    B4DC17E9-3E3A-4B29-99EF-F62EBF3F2A41.jpeg
    Click the link inside ivmmeta.com
    It says 44 are peer reviewed.

    Then send the source you have that only 12 people worldwide have died as a result of the vaccine.
    Been asking for this lie sourced for weeks.
    Or will you just admit it’s a lie and you pulled that number completely out your ass?
    #BigPharmaBro
     
    #257     Aug 27, 2021
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Yet when you go to the claimed studies none are peer reviewed. LOL
     
    #258     Aug 27, 2021
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer


    Why is the study in an open access journal if its peer reviewed? Who peer reviewed it?

    Just random insults from the inbred boomer all the time. Eat more horseshit.
     
    #259     Aug 27, 2021
  10. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Random website run by some moron says its peer reviewed means it actually is?
    Why don't you link the study itself and show who peer reviewed it.
     
    #260     Aug 27, 2021
    Cuddles and gwb-trading like this.