The filing says OPPOSITE of what you are alleging, ANOTHER self own, maybe next time reading your own shit.
It's like you morons can't read past 10 words and jump to conclusions based on articles that say opposite of what you morons imply. How is that voter fraud thing going? Trump reinstated yet? Should I start bumping your voter fraud and Hillary in jail threads? Loser.
You idiot. mRNA medicines are considered gene therapy by the FDA. Who gives a shit if they irreversibly alter DNA or not or whether Moderna’s does or does not.
The science guy is back with his daily dose of bullshit, some fellow inbred showed him a screenshot which describes the status of mRNA tech BEFORE the first successful vaccine and he then reads the first line on a paper and tries to pas that off as SCIENCE. This is the biggest problem with redneck hillbilly boomers, they cannot process anything longer than one line. Here is some BASIC SCIENTIFIC research that you can get even from WebMD For the vaccines to alter a person's genes, Offit explains, the mRNA instructions would have to enter the cell's control center, the nucleus. The nucleus is walled off from the rest of the cell by its own membrane. To get past that membrane, the mRNA would have to have an enzyme called a nuclear access signal, Offit says, "which it doesn't have." Even if it could get into the nucleus, the single strand of mRNA would have to be translated back into a double stranded DNA. https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210719/covid-19-vaccines-not-gene-therapy
There are many definitions of gene therapy. mRNA therapeutics are one of them. Even the FDA agrees. Maybe they will change the definition one day to suit the anti-science narrative, like the WHO did for Herd Immunity. You’d like that since you have no clue about how science and medicine are studied and practiced.
Post a citation from FDA where they 'agreed' that mRNA vaccines are gene therapy. Gene therapy is defined on FDA site and the way mRNA vaccines exist - its SCIENTIFICALLY impossible for them to alter DNA. Why don't you cite an actual scientific paper for your bullshit instead of lecturing like you are an expert on the topic? Give us a clue, MrScience.
“Most days during the coronavirus pandemic, Cardinal Raymond Burke could be found strolling down the streets of Rome maskless and carrying rosary beads. The 73-year-old conservative cardinal was an early critic of social distancing and, later, an unabashed skeptic of the vaccine,” the Washington Post reports. “On Tuesday, Burke announced he had tested positive for the coronavirus. Now, the cardinal is in a hospital bed in his native Wisconsin, breathing with the help of a ventilator.” Burke once said that Catholics who voted for Obama had “collaborated with evil.”