So what. A couple thousand Americans might die of swine flu and you want to militarize the Country for that? Get some perspective.
+1 or 2 The whole paranoid idea of the U.S. being in fear of a bunch of thugs and 3rd world never-do-wells has always intrigued me. In reality, the bastards did actually win, we have lost our fun of flying, we actually had color coded fear numbers. One of the other threads mentioned something about democrat=lie typical of lucrum or whatever, the child who just types in grade school name calling. Lies? You want to talk about lies? We, as a nation, are still reeling from the lies from Bush and his comrades. What a joke, if it didn't kill so many American kids, and ruin our name in the rest of the world. Nice to see some actual somber discussions. These children really get to me with their biased name calling. Almost as bad as that poor kid, mucho grande or whatever, sending posts to himself for some kind of support. Man, hard to find anyone on here any longer who actually has a brain. Thanks for giving me some hope. c
He voted for the authorization to use military force to invade Afghanistan and take out the Taliban. USM higher-ups allowed Bin Laden to "slip away" in Tora Bora, where he was surrounded. Paul wouldn't have let that happen. Nor would Paul have allowed the "airlift of evil" that saw thousands of top Al Queda and Taliban escape into Pakistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airlift_of_Evil As far as cleaning up the stragglers, Ron supports judicious use of Letters of Marque and Reappraisal - essentially a Constitutionally-sanctioned targeted hit against specific belligerents, with a reward. In todays world, it would imply contracting a Black Water XE or foreign agents to kill/capture named enemies for a couple billion. Imagine the money and lives that could have been saved if that approach was taken? But, of course, that wasn't the point.... <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YSP9NteApqI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I read somewhere that they do NOT have a constitution. So, are they applying religious law based on Torah/Talmud/etc?
1. Where is the constitution? Is it the torah/talmud/etc? 2. "We are already built": He did not credit the american money/expertise/knowledge/etc that great america and great americans gave them as aid. Where is the thank you?
Well, let's see. An attempt to discuss or just plain not someone who understands english well. If there is no change, as you say, then I guess we still have the Bush doctrines in place. Hmm, troops out of Iraq vs. invading Iraq. Actually got Osama vs. spending zillions for nothing. I could go on, but don't want to get you tied up too long. And, you're concerned that I type my first initial in my posts. I guess that's better than name calling. Maybe your therapy is working. Too bad to see young children in therapy. c
?? Obama is Bush II. Any perceived real "change" is an illusion of Odumbo's sheeple so they don't have to face the reality that they fucked up supporting him. What would the narcissistic need of a haughty arrogant condescending jack ass to put a repetitious unnecessary initial at the end of each post, have to do with name calling?