Let them FIGHT! Chris Cillizza and Michael Avenatti get into a SERIOUS pissing match and there’s not enough popcorn As we told you earlier, even POLITICO is accepting that Michael Avenatti’s 15 minutes are running out. Heck, James Woods offered to start a GoFundMe for your and our favorite creepy p*rn lawyer … which he didn’t seem to have much interest in. Psh. Ironically, CNN’s Chris Cillizza shared the POLITICO story about Michael as well, and we say ‘ironically’ because it is Cillizza’s outlet that really helped build Stormy’s lawyer up in the first place. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/...-pissing-match-and-theres-not-enough-popcorn/
Stormy Daniels’s lawyer Michael Avenatti, who had been toying with a White House bid, said on Tuesday that he will not run for president in 2020. “After consultation with my family and at their request, I have decided not to seek the Presidency of the United States in 2020,” Avenatti said in a statement posted to Twitter. “I do not make this decision lightly — I make it out of respect for my family.” LOL. Considering the only vote he was going to get was his own, a wise decision.
This left-wing hero is the gift that keeps on giving. Thursday schadenfreude: Michael Avenatti gets cleaned out by ex-wife "What we have here is a deadbeat, someone who didn't pay his child support, someone who ran out on his tab for years, starting with his business partners, then the IRS, thinking the law would never catch up to him. What's more, he broke his marriage vows, housing a girlfriend in Century City at some point on the side, who later charged him with girlfriend-beating." https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...hael_avenatti_gets_cleaned_out_by_exwife.html
As I previously stated back on Nov15 (below) when the ex wives rose to defend him. They just wanted to make sure that he was not beaten down to the point where he could not make his payments to them. I rest my case. ===================================================== Avennati's ex wives rise to defend him. Translation, they want their elevated child support and divorce settlement payments to continue flowing at current levels. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...nce-charge-ex-wives-defend-lawyer/2010175002/ #54 Nov 15, 2018Report
Yup. As I said. "ordered to pay 1.9 million in back spousal and child support" so the ex-wives have a vested interest in seeing him no lose his reputation and law license so that he will still have a source of income. Keep trying though. giggle.
keep giggling like an idiot. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9718a256cbd_story.html?utm_term=.580f83580137 LOS ANGELES — Michael Avenatti has agreed to turn over to his estranged wife a corporate jet, Ferrari and other assets as part of their divorce settlement. Orange County Judge Carol Henson on Tuesday accepted the agreement stipulating that some of Avenatti’s assets be liquidated and sold for back child and spousal support. He also must pay at least $80,000 to Lisa Storie-Avenatti by Jan. 2. Avenatti, who represents porn star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Donald Trump, previously agreed to pay Storie-Avenatti more than $150,000 a month in child and spousal support. Among the assets Avenatti is turning over are a 2017 Ferrari GT Spider, five watches including a Rolex that retails for $12,000, a sculpture by famed architect Frank Gehry and a six-seat business jet worth millions. Avenatti stressed that development was an agreed-upon deal as part of his divorce proceedings. He said he and his ex-wife came to an agreement, known as a stipulation, in which certain assets would be transferred to her and she would sell them. The court then approved the deal. “This was done by way of a negotiated consensual agreement. I wasn’t ordered to do anything,” he said. In United States law, a stipulation is a formal legal acknowledgment and agreement made between opposing parties before a pending hearing or trial. For example, both parties might stipulate to certain facts and so not have to argue them in court. After the stipulation is entered into, it is presented to the judge.
Yeh. keep posting the same thing as if it counters what I said or supports it. I argued that the women have a vested interest in seeing him remain as an income producer so they stuck up for him. Then you post something that shows that he owes one of them 150,000 a month and the link in the first post says he owes 1.9 million in back child and spousal support. Might want to give it a rest mate. You are looking less-than-smart.