%% AKA machine learning, may work well + win well in a chess game. But maybe ''artificial'' is a more honest term for it?? WHO believes the JUNE newscaster ,that said it would replace lawyers??[NOT a joke or prediction] WE already know it tends to be one sided= big flaw from the get go. I would never want to use a machine[learning] for my real estate closing or lawyer ; even if they got good @ that. A human lawyer may use it ? Thanks