Wow! you are a dumbass. I am not attempting to make an argument. I am simply asking questions. Learn the difference fucking retard. Your stupidity is extremely annoying.
So, the answer to my questions so far is they don't fucking know and the biodistribution of the vaccine is throughout the body which is incredibly alarming. Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 and are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005; WHO, 2014). Toxicity conclusions The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available. In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern. Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential, pregnant women and breastfeeding women has been provided in both the Information for UK Healthcare Professionals and the Information for UK recipients.
Yes... which is why follow-up studies are being done for pregnant women. So far the results show no significant issues.
You didn't read it. The answer to my questions is that they don't know and/or it is distributed throughout the body which would explain inflammation in the heart. Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 and are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005; WHO, 2014). Adequate advice with regard to women of childbearing potential,
That is the results from the test on rats that is referenced on the webpage. Until I am confident that the below is not a problem, I am not taking the vaccine. Period. If it is a problem, oh shit.
Nor where Pharmacokinetic studies done on most other vaccines as a requirement for approval -- as noted in the documentation they are not considered to be a requirement or needed for vaccine approval. Yet many biodistribution studies have been done over time --- just not included in paperwork for approval since it is not required. Typically Pharmacokinetic studies are only required for approval submission for particular types of drugs. Explain to me why a pharma company would include studies in their submission paperwork for approval which are not required -- it would simply serve to confuse the regulators.
So you are pushing the Japanese study and chart which has been pushed by anti-vaxxers as they make many false claims about biodistribution and the COVID vaccines. Even the Japanese regulators stated the study & this chart shows there are no issues with the vaccines. The article I posted early on this thread today discusses the mis-interpretation by anti-vaxxers of the Japanese information in detail. All you are doing is re-posting a pile of anti-vaxxer CRUD --- all of it has already been debunked as complete nonsense.
I AM NOT PUSHING ANYTHING! I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT!!!!!!! You are the resident arrogant know-it-all wrt vaccines. I couldn't find the answer to my questions online so I thought I would ask you. Apparently, asking you anything only gets a complete asshole response. I learned my lesson. I will never ask the resident asshole arrogant asshole anything again.
No. I know what you are trying to argue (as a question) and it’s Facebook nonsense. You don’t have to play dumb, we know you are. Like I said, it’s fascinating.