Kushner: Trump ‘knows Republicans are stupid’

Sample size and MOE issues

 

Wrong again.

 

Costs

 

How much did a MI or WI cost?

 

If accuracy is not a concern, then it is cheaper not to poll at all.

 

In 52 out of 57 elections the popular vote winner has won the election so its pretty accurate.

 

Yes, very accurate. In this century, the popular winner won 60% of the time.

 

We are only 17 % into the century.It happened twice in a short time period in 1876 and 1888 but didn't happen again until 2000.

 

If 60

If you are happy with the accuracy, have at it.

 

91 % is very good.I'd love for pollsters to do the same extensive and frequent polling on the state level as they do in the national polls but with the popular vote winner winning 91 % of the time I know the cost outweigh the benefits.Extensive and frequent polling is expensive,just ask Trump


http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs...es/303615-trump-camp-refusing-to-pay-pollster

Trump camp refusing to pay pollster

By Mark Hensch - 10/31/16 02:16 PM EDT

Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is reportedly refusing to pay some of veteran Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio's expenses.

The campaign’s latest Federal Election Commission (FEC) report shows it contesting $766,756.67 that Fabrizio’s firm says it is owed for polling, The Washington Post reported Monday.