Kung Flu

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Buy1Sell2, Feb 11, 2020.

Should we be worried about The Kung Flu? (select up to 4)

  1. Politically

    8 vote(s)
    44.4%
  2. Financially

    11 vote(s)
    61.1%
  3. Medically

    13 vote(s)
    72.2%
  4. Socially

    7 vote(s)
    38.9%
  5. Not Politically

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%
  6. Not Financially

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%
  7. Not Medically

    3 vote(s)
    16.7%
  8. Not Socially

    3 vote(s)
    16.7%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Yes.... and people being tested have been using the identity of others -- -as happened in this particular case.

    Either they are trying to avoid their employer knowing or avoid being charged a fee. All they need is the code to call in with to get their results.
     
    #531     Sep 8, 2020
  2. They may not want to meet the self-isolation requirements or have discussions about contacts too if they test positive but still want to know if they have it.
     
    #532     Sep 8, 2020
  3. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    I'll bet DeSantis is behind this Tom Foolery.
     
    #533     Sep 8, 2020
    Buy1Sell2 likes this.
  4. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    I'll bet that's the only case like that---
     
    #534     Sep 8, 2020


  5. Viral claim that only 6% of COVID-19 deaths were caused by the virus is flat-out wrong



    I wonder the Asians aren't dismissing Covid as a political talking point.
     
    #535     Sep 8, 2020
    gwb-trading likes this.
  6. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Yeah... the CDC said this viral claim was bullshiat.
     
    #537     Sep 8, 2020
  8. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Also the same symptoms of caver's lung aka histoplasmosis.

    https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/histoplasmosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20373495

    You would have to ask yourself why would they not have this after doing that work and quite probably some other nasties.
     
    #538     Sep 8, 2020
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    The claims I have heard simply stated that 6% of all deaths had no other co-morbidity, which is true. COVID only deaths were 6%. As for what killed an individual in the other 94%, no one is saying COVID didn't play a role - even the most significant role. But if someone wanted to know what their chance of dying from COVID was, and they were perfectly healthy with no additional pathologies, the 6% is the number we're interested in. And that doesn't work with those (like yourself) driving the narrative.
     
    #539     Sep 8, 2020
    Buy1Sell2 likes this.

  10. I couldn't help but notice there were "infectious disease experts" making the claim regarding the other 94%. I wonder why they're not cherry picking the data - why aren't they pushing for the lower rate. Is science pushing a narrative?? Is science a liberal conspiracy?? Does George Soros have a hand in this????

    At the end of the day, the rate is a lot higher than 6% because a majority of the population are not "perfectly healthy."
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2020
    #540     Sep 8, 2020