You seem have a very low grasp of reality buddy. Honestly, this is a very normal trend up. Tell me something, if someone bought IBM today because they like their numbers, what on earth has that got to do with QE3 ???
SPX, 1310.99. FV, 1162.41, OFV, 1310.47. POFVF, 1356.44. Note the jump in POFVF. I might have to take a big loss soon.
So, after markets rallied all week against your blessed indicators, you gave them a protein shake and changed their value. Honestly, you remind me of a witch doctor the way you abuse numbers.
Since there is no point in making predictions unless we revisit them, let's see how our entertainer succeeded: There were 4 trading days this week and they all managed to be in the green, if only for a little %. Not even one slightly red day!!! The market closed about 2% higher than last Friday. Not to mention volatility decreased and TH-FR stayed in a 5 points range. Hey boss, do you have another one for next week?
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7ah6WUajOI8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Anybody with significant experience trading near month options knows that the scenario he predicted was a huge long shot. Some big theories he's posted : 1. All companies without significant dividends are essentially worthless investments. 2. Making 20% on conservative investments is easy. 3. Counter trending indexes is a good trade if his indicators say so. Plus I'm not sure how to categorize the new ideas like "calibrating my indicators". Where on earth does he get these ideas ? It suggests to me he is entirely self taught and has no real education in finance. There is overwhelming, easy to reach public domain evidance that refutes all of these listed theories. He just refuses to see it.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113413&perpage=30 Tell me again how you rationalize giving others a hard time about their results.