Kudos to MMs

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by nitro, Oct 23, 2008.

  1. Super cala fragilistic ex b ala doses
    nitro,just the sound of it is really quite atrocious
    when you need to buy you sell
    in calibrated doses
    super cala fragilistic,help me holy moses..
     
    #3571     Sep 7, 2011
  2. nitro

    nitro

    It could very well be, but this is a very difficult thing to prove with so many moving parts.

    There is a mathematical tool that can aid in discovering lag relations, the Auto-correlation, but i don't have historical data. That is why this is so hard.

    This is a very whippy market, and trend systems tend to do badly in them. Still, I am learning tons.
     
    #3572     Sep 7, 2011
  3. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Nitro. This is absurd. Why don't you just paper trade this thing. You obviously don't have all the kinks worked out. Just paper trade it until you know it's consistent.
     
    #3573     Sep 7, 2011
  4. This is AWESOME!
     
    #3574     Sep 7, 2011
  5. You don't have a trend system!!! IT'S A SICK, TWISTED, ABSURD MEAN REVERSION TWIST OF SANITY!!!!
     
    #3575     Sep 7, 2011
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Yes, you are very talented. LOL.
     
    #3576     Sep 7, 2011
  7. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    I was right about Nitro 3 years ago, and recently a month ago:

    His system is actually gold, pure gold. He just needs to evaluate the "edge" with an inverse look. Thus when the FV goes BELOW the market, he should go LONG, and vica versa.

    In the last 4 weeks the market had one of its worse August, the FV difference was hugely positive. On the day when it went negative the market had one of its biggest rally. Quite simple really...

    No charge for the advice....
     
    #3577     Sep 7, 2011
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    That's two data points. Not exactly statistically significant.
     
    #3578     Sep 7, 2011
  9. by that standard, you'd want to hire a few 'tards to trade for ya.

    you should have no problem finding some on et. throw a dart.
     
    #3579     Sep 7, 2011
  10. nitro

    nitro

    Calibrated FV, 1140.88. FV 1290.68.

    Remember, the difference between FV and Calibrated FV (CFV) is that CFV attempts a correction term to FV that attempts to value the probability of a recession. When the chance of recession is 0, CFV will converge or even go above FV, what people will term "Risk on".

    Some people have suggested that the best estimate of "FV" is not the ends, but the average of the two, or "FV" = (FV - CFV) / 2. That is an interesting idea. Recall that a simple moving average if a FIR

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_impulse_response_filter

    and we can back out the weights by the following equation:

    SPX = xFV - yCFV

    where x, y are the weights of some FIR average. That is more sophisticated than a simple MA, and may be worth backing out every day.
     
    #3580     Sep 8, 2011