Kudos to MMs

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by nitro, Oct 23, 2008.

  1. nitro

    nitro

    Well it has been a long time, but all things change. Calibrated FV, 1122.34. FV 1283.39. SPX 1165.24.

    Shorting the market is more complicated because if i just go long the 55 delta puts, I would be buying very high vola. So for now I will use ES with stops at resistance.

    S Sep ES 1164.75

    I am not getting tons of edge. This is new territory for Calibrated FV, so it will be a learning experience.
     
    #3561     Sep 6, 2011
  2. Ok, so let me get this straight... you have been bullish for nearly 200 handles straight down and now, after numerous & substantial losses you want to be short? A learning experience? Past tense, yes a learning experience and a very expensive one at that. The wildest and potentially most profitible period for trading since the gyrations of late 2008/early 2009 and you call it a learning experience? You seem to be quite an intellectual, yes I will give you that. But as a trader you don't rank. Not even bush league.
     
    #3562     Sep 6, 2011
  3. And as for "buying very high vola", how is it any different than the "very high vola" you have been buying with each successive call purchase??? In fact EVERY SINGLE 55 DELTA CALL PURCHASE YOU WOULD HAVE MADE WOULD HAVE BEEN AT A HIGHER IV THAN THE 55 DELTA PUT AT THAT INSTANCE IN TIME. GUARANTEED.
     
    #3563     Sep 6, 2011
  4. [​IMG]
     
    #3564     Sep 6, 2011
  5. nitro

    nitro

    Calibrated FV, 1147.33. FV 1282.47.
     
    #3565     Sep 7, 2011
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    And where is your stop?
     
    #3566     Sep 7, 2011
  7. I consider it a near statistical impossibility to be wrong this many times in a row.
     
    #3567     Sep 7, 2011
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Paging Dr. Martingale. Dr. Martingale, please start averaging up stat.
     
    #3568     Sep 7, 2011
  9. Please, don't stop.

    I'm starting a fade fund. Expect to be up 500% by Dec,
     
    #3569     Sep 7, 2011
  10. could the model be in fact backward looking? a lag of ~30 days? have you run tests to see if it is a good predictor of past market moves?
     
    #3570     Sep 7, 2011