It sounds here like you are defending the "large accounting firm". As I understand the situation, the reason the accounting firm is no longer in existance is because they were a participant in the fraud, not a victim.
No. I'm not defending the part of the firm involved in the fraud. However, it was a worldwide firm with a lot of employees who weren't crooks either and they got swept up in it as well.
Wee man youâre quite the fool. Enron merged with a lot of companies. So a guy working for a firm for 30 years that merged with Enron lost his 7% on income he put in weekly to retire on. He also lost whatever % his company matched to it. That could easily be 500k that a 60 year old man was going to retire on. These are field guys making basic livings to start so how do they retire now.