Yeah, it is when you mom is. Ask the IRS. You are a (fake) Jew, if Bibi rang you would sell the US out in a moment. Are you even 2nd generation? Everyone can see you are overcompensating to hide your treacherous nature. You are deceiful in everything. Seeing your true nature here, I'd really have to question what you got up to at work.
That's how justice works, make the accusations and give them a fair trial to defend themselves in a court of law. Even your cartoons are dumb, makes sense.
Official rules to 'Devil's Triangle' drinking game https://slate.com/culture/2018/10/devils-triangle-rules-brett-kavanaugh-drinking-game.html
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’ U.S. President Donald Trump said the woman admitted she was drunk at a dormitory party where the alleged behavior occurred. The woman, Deborah Ramirez, accused Kavanaugh in an article published in the New Yorker magazine on Sunday of exposing himself to her at a drunken party during the 1983-84 academic year at Yale University."He was so truthful," Trump said about the judge’s interview on Fox News on Monday in which he denied the accusations. © Michael Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday. More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court. “We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says. Brett Kavanaugh says he's a target of a 'revenge' plot 'on behalf of the Clintons' Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh accused Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday of leveraging anti-Trump sentiment following the bruising 2016 presidential election into a smear campaign designed to tarnish his reputation and sink his confirmation. "This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election. The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate. The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations. American Bar Association calls for Senate to postpone Brett Kavanaugh vote The American Bar Association asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to suspend its consideration of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court until the FBI can complete an investigation into allegations of sexual assault against California professor Christine Blasey Ford, according to a report published late Thursday. The organization asked the Republican-controlled committee not to hold a vote Friday morning. The Senate is expected to vote as a body on Kavanaugh's nomination this weekend. “Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair. Here’s a copy of their letter: https://pressfrom.info/us/news/poli...vanaugh-for-lack-of-judicial-temperament.html
Here in the USA, "Justice" works when the prosecution proves guilt, the defendant is innocent until then. Normally witnesses that can collaborate testimony and actual physical evidence are used to prove guilt. Not sure the type of Kangaroo Courts your accustomed.