You don't know how memory works, do you? I'd explain, but you'd either forget or wouldn't understand.
Senate Judiciary Committee refers false Kavanaugh allegation to FBI, DOJ for criminal investigation By Veronica Stracqualursi, CNN Updated at 0457 GMT (1257 HKT) Washington (CNN)The Senate Judiciary Committee has referred an individual who made "materially false statements" alleging misconduct by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh to the FBI and Justice Department for a criminal investigation. "Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal," committee Chairman Chuck Grassley wrote in a letter Saturday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Chris Wray. Grassley wants the FBI and DOJ to investigate whether the individual potentially obstructed the committee's nomination process of Kavanaugh by providing fraudulent information to committee investigators. "It is illegal to make materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements to Congressional investigators. It is illegal to obstruct Committee investigation," the Iowa Republican wrote. The office of Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat who sits on the Judiciary Committee, received a call on Monday concerning an allegation -- now found to be false -- of a 1985 incident in Newport where a woman was sexually assaulted on a boat by two heavily inebriated men she referred to as "Brett and Mark." The person being referred has had his name redacted from the materials released. He said he heard of the assault that same day and physically confronted the two attackers, according to the documents. He falsely claimed that he realized one of the attackers was Kavanaugh after seeing his yearbook photo on TV over the weekend. Kavanaugh was interviewed by the committee on Tuesday about the allegation and categorically denied the claim. "I was not in Newport, haven't been on a boat in Newport. Not with Mark Judge on a boat, nor all those three things combined. This is just completely made up, or at least not me," Kavanaugh told the committee, according to transcripts. The committee said after the transcripts of the interview became public on Wednesday, the individual "recanted" and apologized for the claim through a social media post. In his letter to Sessions and Wray, Grassley wrote that the committee is "grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know." "But when individuals provide fabricated allegations to the Committee, diverting Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations, it materially impedes our work," he said. The FBI is currently conducting a supplemental background investigation "limited to current credible allegations" of sexual assault and misconduct against Kavanaugh, with a deadline of Friday to conclude its probe.
Memory is notoriously bad over time, according to multiple psychologists, and witness testimony is deeply deeply flawed over 20 minutes let alone 36 years....... Ill give you an example..... when i was in highschool a friend of mine picked me up for school and while we were parked at a light some guy honked his horn at us, someone in our car flipped him the bird...... then he got out of his car and took a crow bar to our back seat window. We got out of the car, and he peeled away. We reported it to the police, a half an hour later, and all 4 of us described what he was wearing differently...... I thought he was wearing a hoody, my buddy thought he was wearing a grey shirt, another buddy thought he was in kakis.... This is only a half an hour after something happened..... none of us were lying when we described him, and every single one of us described him differently.
Yes. She decided to bring this up the same year Kavanaugh's name came up for nomination. This is a political character assassination of a good person by the liberals.
It's like you don't even know what's going on even though you're tuned to the same channel. Did you even listen to what she was saying? Why she chose to come forward when she did? Evidently, you did not.
The guy was on top of her. The experience was traumatic and in-your-face. You're telling me if someone you knew tried to rape you and was lyiing on top of you inches from your face that you'd forget who it was in time? What's the matter with you? Either you think she's lying or you don't. There is no middle ground here.
Go ahead and explain. We will listen. Go for it. Tell us. Explain it to the others too who are supposed to be remembering that they were at the party but say they have no memory of it. Oh I see. "Recovered memories" are better and more reliable than real memories. Oh, wait. I just remembered that I am going to be abused tomorrow. I hope I get a big book deal from that.
You state that as fact. What is the evidence? And who was the guy, and what is the evidence to confirm that?
Given the fact that her own friend has no clue who kavanaugh is the odds of it being him are so minute, it doesnt even warrant the investigation...... But the FBI will come up with nothing while all the nuts like Avenatti keep piling accusations on. Lots of people live life in a victim complex, i could very easily see a woman who thought she was wronged somehow, spinning an idea in her head that she was sexually assaulted, especially when it takes 36 years. Even if you accept the Ford account of what happened, the other 2 allegations are so fucking shady you would have to be a complete rube in order to believe them.