Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Told Senate Judiciary He Witnessed Her Coach A Friend On Polygraphs An ex-boyfriend of Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford told Senate investigators he witnessed her coach a friend on how to take a polygraph, contradicting her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week. OCTOBER 2, 2018 By Sean Davis In a sworn statement provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a man who claims to be an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford says that he personally witnessed Ford coach a friend on how to take a polygraph exam. If true, it would mean Ford provided false testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week when she claimed she had never had any discussions with anyone about how to take a polygraph. The troubling allegations about Ford’s polygraph history and potentially false testimony were revealed Tuesday in a letter from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, to attorneys for Ford. Ford and her attorneys have thus far refused to provide all polygraph-related documents and media to the Senate for review. “The full details of Dr. Ford’s polygraph are particularly important because the Senate Judiciary Committee has received a sworn statement from a longtime boyfriend of Dr. Ford’s, stating that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on polygraph examinations,” Grassley wrote. “When asked under oath in the hearing whether she’d ever given any tips or advice to someone who was planning on taking a polygraph, Dr. Ford replied, ‘Never.'” “This statement raises specific concerns about the reliability of her polygraph examination results,” he continued. “The Senate therefore needs this information.” The sworn statement from Ford’s ex-boyfriend directly contradicts what Ford repeatedly told the Senate under oath last week about her alleged lack of experience with polygraph exams, suggesting that Ford may have lied to the Senate panel. “During some of the time we were dating, Dr. Ford lived with Monica L. McLean, who I understood to be be her life-long best friend,” the ex-boyfriend, whose name was redacted from the statement he gave to the Senate, wrote. “During that time, it was my understanding that McLean was interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office.” “I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam,” he said. “Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked, and helped McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam.” At last week’s hearing, Ford was specifically asked by Rachel Mitchell, an experienced sex crimes prosecutor who was hired by the committee to question Ford and Kavanaugh, whether she had advised anyone on how to take a polygraph. “Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?” Mitchell asked. “Never,” Ford responded. “And I don’t just mean countermeasures,” Mitchell said, “but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.” “No,” Ford said. “[H]ave you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?” Mitchell continued. “Never,” Ford replied again. The ex-boyfriend also said in his statement that during their six-year-long romantic relationship, Ford never mentioned the alleged assault against her, Brett Kavanaugh, or a fear of flying. Federal law makes it a crime to provide false information to congressional officials in the course of an investigation. A person convicted of lying to Congress can be imprisoned for up to five yearsunder the statute. In his letter, Grassley also repeated his request of Ford to provide her therapists’ records to the Senate for review. According to Ford, she first shared details of the alleged sexual assault against her with a marriage therapist and an individual therapist. Despite providing portions of the notes to a report for the Washington Post, Ford has thus far refused to disclose the records to the Senate. “I renew my request for notes from therapy sessions in which Dr. Ford discussed the alleged assault by Judge Kavanaugh,” Grassley wrote. “The Washington Post reported that some notes were provided to The Post, and Dr. Ford’s testimony indicated that these notes were highly relevant to her allegations.” “These notes have been repeatedly cited as corroboration even while written 30 years after the alleged event and in apparent contradiction with testimony and other public statements regarding several key details of the allegations, including when the alleged attack occurred, how many individuals were present in the bedroom in which the attack was alleged to have occurred, and how many individuals attended the party,” Grassley noted. “Please provide the requested materials to the Senate Judiciary Committee immediately,” the letter from Grassley concluded. The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to be a Supreme Court Justice was favorably reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee last Friday and is currently pending before the full Senate, which is awaiting the completion of a supplemental background check investigation by the FBI before it votes on whether to confirm Kavanaugh.
https://www.businessinsider.com/rep...gh-trump-should-nominate-someone-else-2018-10 Republican Sen. Ben Sasse drops a bombshell on the debate over Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska gave an impassioned speech on sexual assault and the #MeToo movement on the Senate floor Wednesday night. Sasse also dropped a bombshell about where he stands on Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's second nominee to the Supreme Court. "I urged the president to nominate a different individual. I urged the president to nominate a woman," Sasse said. He recounted the experiences of two personal friends he said were raped, adding that the #MeToo movement has been "complicated," but also a "very good thing." Then Sasse turned back to Trump: "We all know that the president cannot lead us through this time."
This is my shocked face. Brett Kavanaugh Rape Accuser Admits She Made Up Her Story The Senate Judiciary Committee has referred a Kentucky woman to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) after she admitted making up an accusation that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh had raped her. According to the referral, the woman, Judy Munro-Leighton, contacted the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding a letter presented by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) from “Jane Doe” of Oceanside, California, who claimed that Kavanaugh had raped her “several times.” As Breitbart News reported last month: According to committee transcripts released Sunday, the accuser, who signed the mysterious letter as “Jane Doe,” alleges Kavanaugh and a friend raped her “several times” after giving her a lift home from a party — making no attempt to claim a time or place for the lurid story. The accuser claims Kavanaugh groped her, slapped her, and force her to perform sexual acts. “They forced me to go into the backseat and took 2 turns raping me several times each. They dropped me off 3 two blocks from my home,” the accuser wrote, claiming the pair told her, “No one will believe if you tell. Be a good girl.” The letter, marked with the word “urgent,” did not include a return address, nor did it offer clues regarding the accuser’s background. “A group of white men, powerful senators who won’t believe me, will come after me” if I reveal the incident, the accuser wrote, prompting observers to speculate the sender could be a minority. Munro-Leighton contacted the committee via e-mail, claiming that she was “Jane Doe” and that Kavanaugh had raped her. However, she later admitted that she was not “Jane Doe” and had never met Kavanaugh. In his referral to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) elaborates: Committee investigators began investigating Ms. Munro-Leighton’s allegations. Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky. … In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Kavanaugh denied the allegations by “Jane Doe” and others, and was later confirmed by the Senate.
You know this is serious shiite. In the hearings and the media there was endless discussion about how kavanaugh-types were part of a boys-will-boys type of culture that goes unpunished in society. But these women will most likely be set aside and dismissed as just some flaky shiite that flaky women do because they get hysterial or flaky or something but no big deal. Move on. NO!!!! They need to be prosecuted- given a fair trial- and then lock their sorry fucking arses up for at least a couple years- if found guilty. Just frigging insane what they did to kavanaugh and his family. Just insane. The only man who would step up and put an end to it was Susan Collins. I know that my harsh tone toward these women will cause some of the lib men here to cry. Tough tuna. Use your goddamn tampon to dry your tears. Oh, and yes, I know, Kavanaugh got distraught and angry and swung back to defend himself as he was being reviewed to be a justice while others were informing him that he himself was not entitled to the presumption of innocence and if it is painful explaining to his daughters that he really did not "attend at least ten parties where he stood in rape lines" well, hey, women have had bigger problems so we need to even that historical score. Just insane. These flaky broads and the feminized men here and in society who are too pussy-whipped to know right from wrong took this country into one of the ugliest episodes in American history that was done in total public view, anyway. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON ALL OF YOU TARDS. SHAME. Show these women no mercy. How much mercy did they show kavanaugh when they decided to have their little fun. The ford woman probably is immune from prosecution because she is so spaced out and basically just says she remembers something that none of her four witnesses remember. The other bitches: 1)one has confessed to making everything up. 2) the other has plead the fifth or- did before the committee in closed session I think- although she has testimony on the record to the fbi which she will not stand by now. TAKE THEM DOWN HARD AND PUT THEM AWAY-with all the due process they want.
Luckily, the media never picked up the story, only Breitbart seems to have. I'm sure it was vetted as BS by legitimate outlets, just like I'm sure multiple other were vetted.
It would be pretty tough to fabricate this, the media didnt pick up on it because they are blatantly partisan..... The fact that they didnt pick up on it is a mark on them...... not breitbart..... NBC also held off on a story till after Kavanaughs confirmation, that destroyed Swetnicks claim, what reason would they have for that other than the fact that they are operating as an arm of the democratic party? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...t-avenatti-claims-regarding-kavanaugh-n924596 In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
I'm saying the media didn't pick up this lady's story because it was vetted as BS, not that they didn't pick up the story of her getting hammered for making up BS. I never saw this lady's claims anywhere on the news, so her claims were a non-issue to Kavanaugh's potential confirmation as far as I'm concerned. Swetnick's other witness has been all over the place...first she confims, then denies, then confirms again. Just read the NBC story. Diverting committee's resources is a bunch of bunk...they were busy looking for a bar on which to celebrate after they had a nomination.
So 2 of the 4 women have been referred for indictment. Avenatti has been referred for indictment. One women who is referred for indictment admitted that she completed lied her a$$ off. A third women is under investigation to be referred for indictment. Obviously Christine Blasey Ford lied about many things including the extra front door of her house, etc. - she needs to be referred for indictment as well rather than collecting nearly a million dollars from GoFundMe.