The accuser is highly regarded at her job, has impeccable integrity, and has no known patterns of making up accusations as is being alleged. The accused is an unbalanced corporate con, represented by law skirting interests who is working in collusion with other radical shills, all of them financed by corporate lobbyists.Gee, who to believe?
Not if you want to be part of SCOTUS! GOP voter: What boy hasn't done this in high school? - Just saw it on CNN, link does not get posted here. CNN interviewed group of "conservative" women. Would the same sympathy be extended to him, if he was a democratic nominee, by these women??? The logic is, he did not do it, but even if he did, it is no big deal. Disgusting, and these are supposed to be "conservatives".
The accused is highly regarded at his job, has impeccable integrity, and has no known patterns of having accusations hurled at him. The accuser is an unbalanced liberal professor, represented by law skirting interests who are working in collusion with other radical shills, all of them financed by anti-American lobbyists.Gee, who to believe?
If the women were left leaning, yes they'd give him a pass. Decades of evidence in numerous cases to prove that.