Yeh sure, and you probably have your post already to go that says that if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems too. Whatever gets you through the day. And no, having some loon spout off and say she was almost killed by a supreme court nominee is not the most masterful game in town. We are not talking MENSA material. This is just a basic drive-by shooting.
We do need an FBI investigation, on Ford. Why did she scrub her social media accounts? What are her political and business associations? Has she been coached for her testimony? What is her mental heath history? Any arrest records? Any records of violent outbursts, verbal or physical? We need to know more about this woman before we can take her accusations seriously. We also need a congressional committee to look into why Fienstien held on to this information for so long. Was there collusion among democrats and the Washington post to hold this story? We need to know.
When you do not understand do not rush to conclusions. Where did I say "if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems"??? I meant that Ford situation/ploy is a win/win. If she testifies, there is a chance he won't be confirmed. If she does not under pretense that FBI did not investigate, the base will be fired up even more. I guess it is too complicated for you.
Presumption of guilt based on a empty accusation for him is okay, but you have no problem with that. If the woman has a serious mental heath history, a past filled with radical left activism, has made empty claims before, all that goes to her credibility. And since collusion is the topic of the day, all day, every day, we need to know when the left is doing it.
Issues that go to the credibility and motives of a witness- the loon accuser and feinstein for example- are relevant and properly subject to examination. Whether any of those factors are criminal is a separate matter which may or may not be relevant.
okay. I just read things on a hit and run basis at this time of the day so I am dependent on the poster making immediate sense rather than requiring me to consult my ouiji board to find out what is actually meant.
And that credibility should be questioned by the pertinent authorities, not Breitbarters looking for a hit job by skimming thorough her social media history.
She can show up Monday to be questioned by the Senate panel.... or she can shut her trap. EDIT: Please note that I edited this post. Earlier the first part was a re-post of something I posted earlier. I removed this part.