It is more than wanting to be heard. She wants her own hearing. The hearings for others passed and she no-showed, no-submitted written response and no-request to be heard.
No, kavanaugh should not be confirmed as the possibility would remain. This cannot stand for a SCOTUS short of her being proven a liar.
Wrong, the burden is on those doing the accusing to prove that the accused is lying. If they can't do that what might be, could be, someone thinks it ought to be, is irrelevant. Anything is possible, which is why possibility is not the standard, probability is. If he says he wasn't even there and they cannot prove otherwise, probable doubt falls in the favor of the accused. Not to worry, you'll still have a good month to harp about the war on women and hope that your shit has sold to some people.
yes she does. The rules are slightly different for those who get life time appointment to highest court of the land.
This is a woman who apparently wears pussy hats and signs her name off on anti trump legislation. Doesn’t sound like your basic quiet type. Also - social media scrub is not the sign of a person who has nothing to hide.
So, not to be difficult, but I will ask again. When all is said and done and babbled about in regard to what this woman will and will not do Monday, do we have confirmation that she has even agreed to be there? As I said, this whole thing is about dragging the process out so that there will be no confirmation before the midterm elections. It is not about the dems getting her a fair hearing. Do we know whether she and the dems are even interested in having her appear if does not accomplish the goal of dragging things out? Okay, I wont ask again, but the astute ones here might want to think about it a bit. I know the dems are. Let me guess: The dems need more time. I am going to be so shocked when I hear that. And then there is this: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...icans-making-same-mistakes-anita-hill-n910546