Karl Rove : Obama wins 2012

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Grandluxe, Apr 30, 2012.


  1. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Obamabot

    Obamabot

    One who supports Barack Obama and yet knows
    very little or nothing about Obama the man and politician; his history, accomplishments and challenges beyond repeating Obama Camp talking points and/or slogans.

    An Obamabot typically can't define, explain or defend Obama's policies. If an Obamabot is pursued or confronted about his or her seeming blind loyalty and lack of knowledge, he or she will typically launch a 'counter attack' (to a perceived attack) and accuse those who differ as racist, ignorant, hateful, etc. and/or will become resentful, indignant,
    insulting, and even threatening (in cases which are most extreme).
     
    #41     Oct 31, 2012
  2. 1) If you want to believe that he directly called benghazi a terrorist attack go right ahead, I disagree and so did Candy, after the fact: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/candy-cr...-terror-but-thought-he-picked-the-wrong-word/ For all we know he was speaking about the original 9/11 attacks.

    2) Since you deem that in this little excerpt of his Rose Garden speech, obama implied that the attack in benghazi was committed by terrorists, then the excerpts below from his UN speech, a full 14 days later, absolutely imply the attack was due to the video. We KNOW he knew this was bullshit at the time, so it is a LIE. Plus he is contradicting himself (if he called it terrorism in the rose garden), and this excludes all of the contradiction between his admin; carney, rice, clinton, olsen, cutter. Also, this excludes numerous other times where he blamed the video after his rose garden speech (see below).

    "That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world."

    "And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence."

    "There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."

    Note that he mentioned terrorism one time, and NOT in relation to benghazi, but iran.

    "...the Iranian government props up a dictator in Damascus and supports terrorist groups abroad."

    Here is the whole transcript if you don't believe me: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...a-stand-up-for-a-free-society-at-the-un0.html

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZPGmN7Zw9Fk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    ^no mention of terrorists, he is also still claiming the attack was under the cover of mob action.

    Anyway we slice it AK he fucking lied. And this doesn't even touch what actually happened on 9/11/12.. whether he made the call to not intervene in the attack.
     
    #42     Oct 31, 2012
  3. The problem is, you're dealing with facts. IQ47 the wigger is dealing with make-believe.
     
    #43     Oct 31, 2012
  4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

    Troll (Internet)


    In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion
     
    #44     Oct 31, 2012
  5. wildchild

    wildchild

    Why did you need to consult Wikipedia for this? You could have just looked in the mirror.
     
    #45     Nov 1, 2012
  6. Don't confuse these guys too much with the facts. This is all their handlers are giving them as a talking point. It was a sad event, and it would be if it happened at any of our 250 +- embassies. This is a difficult situation, since slimeball terrorists are everywhere, and we simply cannot be everywhere 24/7. It's like fighting a ghost. Could things, in hindsight, been done better, probably, but the actual person in charge has to deal with the real world, not Monday morning quarterbacking.
     
    #46     Nov 1, 2012
  7. Wow, wigger?

    This is why the GOP must expel it's conservative parasite.
     
    #47     Nov 1, 2012
  8. wjk

    wjk

    Sounds like a pretty good description of several who routinely go off topic when the facts stand in the way of their argument.

    Do they qualify as a troll before or after they issue labels at their opponents (name calling)? Let's start with this one: Racist.

    If you call me a name and I respond in kind, who is the troll? Serious question.
     
    #48     Nov 1, 2012
  9. #49     Nov 1, 2012
  10. Do you mean black like Miles Davis? Black like Al Jareau? Black like Bill Cosby? Black like lil Wayne? Black like Colon Powell? Black like Herman Cain?

    Just what exactly do you mean by "black"?
     
    #50     Nov 1, 2012