While theoretically this strategy can have a positive expectancy, I think your term INEFFICIENT is acurate for the retail trader. The amount of time needed to manage this is huge, and even letting a few spreads go deep ITM will kill. Not even mentioning the risk on the naked stuff.
You call my response "trolling" ....I am simply giving you a certain degree of real insight, If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen -- it only displays your level of character and fortitude and wisdom and experience, And besides, this thread is not about me -- I don't want to throw my figures, or % Returns, around here, It's dangerous to Assume things, -- that's where epic blowups can happen, Never underestimate your opponent, This thread should be null and voided, by the way. -- Karen has been exposed as a fake, As is your market performance with this experiment, Good day, Sweet and Sour Bobby
I think many of us enjoyed your posts and were just trying to give you suggestions. I consider DTB2's and sss12's comments as constructive because they gave you specifics of why perhaps you should review/adjust your method to get better results. In fact I am going to use the same to examine my own trades and see if I can improve on them. In the current raging bull market, unless you are consistently bearish, your results could perhaps be better. If you are consistently bearish, maybe it is not a strategy suitable for the current atmosphere. Best wishes.
You sir are a horse's ass. You won't reveal your returns, because you have no returns. You simply criticize others. Take your paper money account and leave me the hell alone. I learn nothing from your input. This is an experiment, fool! At least I report my real and actual returns. If you do have returns, they are surely negative.