Justice Clarence Thomas Dissents From Supreme Court On Election Case: ‘We Need to Make It Clear’

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tsing Tao, Feb 25, 2021.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    I believe they do. More issues that should remain in view.
     
    #51     Feb 25, 2021
    Windlesham1 likes this.
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    LOL
     
    #52     Feb 25, 2021
  3. Atlantic

    Atlantic

    1. could it be that your parents are / were closely related?

    2. do you take any kind of medicine on a regular basis?
     
    #53     Feb 25, 2021
    Windlesham1 likes this.
  4. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    I've come over to your team, Ricter. Make sure I get my membership card.
     
    #54     Feb 25, 2021
    Ricter likes this.
  5. Atlantic

    Atlantic

    still no answer from the freak who claims to be "conservative" ...

    also:

    is lying a "conservative" value?

    is mocking handicapped people a "conservative" value?

    is banging a porn slut while your wife is pregnant a "conservative" value?

    is not paying your bills and not paying taxes a "conservative" value?

    etc. etc. etc.
     
    #55     Mar 1, 2021
    wrbtrader and Windlesham1 like this.
  6. piezoe

    piezoe

    Justice Thomas , in a lapse of logic, did not take into proper account that there has been hearings to a absolutely absurd degree in the lower courts already, and that a protracted and embarrassing hearing in the Highest Court would certainly do nothing to quiet those who are convinced the election was "overwhelming won" by Donald Trump and that there existed a grand conspiracy to steal the election from Mr. Trump. Those many lower courts ruled, in effect, that the numerous cases brought did not constitute a legitimate questioning of the election because there was no evidence of fraud presented that a rational person could believe, once the true facts were known. The lower courts all correctly refused to let all but one case brought on a technicality proceed. There were tens of these case brought before the lower courts. This constitutes a more than adequate hearing of what turned out to be absurd claims of the those bringing these cases.

    This issue will not be laid to rest however, and certainly not because the High Court refused to hear it in full, but rather because of one, charismatic, and extremely dangerous cult leader: a man who intentionally turned a murderous mob lose on his political opposition and his own vice president; a desperate man driven to extreme actions by extreme clinical narcissism and fear of prosecution; a man who would be an autocrat were we to permit it. He persists to spread lies, race hatred, and civil unrest wherever he goes. The worst mistake anyone can make is to believe him, and in so doing ignore the dire threat he poses to our democracy.
     
    #56     Mar 1, 2021
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    Bam! Full stop.
     
    #57     Mar 1, 2021
  8. destriero

    destriero

    lol you lost, move on.

    Make it clear... unless GOP wins. 20:1 more GOP election fraud in 2020 election. Double voting and dead GOP voters.

    GOP legislatures in every "contested" state. They wrote the laws...
     
    #58     Mar 1, 2021
    wrbtrader and Windlesham1 like this.
  9. smallfil

    smallfil

    Massive election fraud needs to be tamped out totally. There is no excuse for the US allowing such a travesty of the November 3, 2020 elections when massive election fraud is allowed and then, lawsuits seeking to correct it is just suppressed. Finally, some Republicans growing a pair and doing something about it.

    https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-appears-ready-uphold-132222346.html
     
    #59     Mar 3, 2021
  10. GOP wins Senate in State X

    Dem wins president in State X

    GOP Claim: VOTER FRAUD ... but only on the first box of the ballot where president selection was, leave the rest of the ballot in place where people voted for the GOP Senators and Congressmen.
     
    #60     Mar 3, 2021
    wrbtrader and destriero like this.