But to Ricter's point, would you accept the ruling if the SCOTUS heard the case and then ruled that there was no sufficient evidence? Or would you then say the court was corrupt because it did not rule the way you believe/want it to?
Could go either way. But from what I read, the irregularities were "extreme"... such that it is highly likely the election was stolen... and by a large margin. Still, no excuse for them to "pass". They fell down on the job and have earned my contempt as a patriot! (Except for Thomas, of course.)
I do not believe this. How many lower courts have already thrown out, what, over 60 cases? The fact they are being thrown out becomes evidence of the conspiracy itself. You can't win against this stuff, it's like negotiating with terrorists.
So tens of millions of people are now comparable to terrorists because they don't believe in your side of the story?
Ok, I don't know that I agree at all with that, but lets go with it for the sake of your argument. This doesn't mean you don't have the court listen to the concern of tens of millions of the country's citizens. If anything, you should WANT the opportunity to clearly denounce the bullshit once and for all.
Problem is... it is not up to the Supreme Court to set up clear rules for future elections.... this case was about a fraud and they decided there was no fraud. They cannot take the case and say, we see no fraud but let us lay down the rules for how future elections should be handled and put our input on it. SC.... stay in your lane. I find it funny that a conservative judge who is usually against judicial activism wants to now get involved in election process and rules which is so NOT the purview of the SC.
There is a lot of proof of massive election fraud. Pretty hard to prove when they are suppressing all the evidence. What are they afraid of if election fraud did not happen in a massive way? The fastest way to debunk it is allow evidence to be provided to settle on who is telling the truth. The fact that they are going thru extreme lengths to suppress evidence tells me the fraud is massive. If they had to actually, audit the votes in those 6 states, numerous instances of election fraud can be proven then, what do they do? Ask usurper, Joe Biden to step down?
On the other hand, Biden did Beat Trump by more than twice as many votes as Hillary beat Trump by, so the public's opinion definitely shifted. Was opposition to the disinformation campaign part of the reason? I'd like to think so.