Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PHOENIX TRADING, Dec 16, 2012.

  1. pspr

    pspr

    1) The hand grenade had better be inert with the explosive removed which renders it a non-grenade. Like most knives, they are not designed to kill but can be easily used for that purpose. Your argument is mute. Hundreds more are killed by cars every day than with guns even though I would guess there are about as many guns as cars.

    2) Hunt not kill people. Also, self defense is not necessarily to kill but to stop/wound/scare, etc. Besides, what they want to regulate are not the guns and knives used every weekend to kill a dozen or so Chicagoans alone. Maybe black people should be banned from owning guns? And, maybe abortion should be banned. It kills even more people every week.

    3) http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ol-hill-debate-on-gun-rights-in-coming-weeks/
     
    #41     Dec 16, 2012
  2. wjk

    wjk

    I'm trying to figure out why she taught him to shoot if she knew he had a disorder.:confused:
     
    #42     Dec 16, 2012
  3. Guns don't kill people. The massive internal injuries that occur when a high velocity, high specific gravity projectile enters a human body, kills people.



    Gun-nuts say guns don't kill people. Gun-nuts are just that. Nuts. And are full of shit, up where their brain should be.
     
    #43     Dec 16, 2012
  4. BSAM

    BSAM

    Brother Close, I regret to inform you that you have too much common sense and that you are definitely not a victim of AOWM (angry old white man) syndrome.
    You will be severely attacked here in P&R if you have too many brain cells working.
    Proceed with care.
     
    #44     Dec 16, 2012
  5. Mav88

    Mav88

    bwwaahhh LOL....... LMAO... ROFLMAO....


    just how does he manage to be so above it all and yet say nothing, HOW? this guy must be Fonzi
     
    #45     Dec 16, 2012
  6. Mav88

    Mav88

    the act of killing must be initiated by a human, how hard is that to understand?

    converse the question: if guns disappear, does killing stop? if the answer is yes then you are correct, if the answer is no your logic is flawed
     
    #46     Dec 16, 2012
  7. Mav88

    Mav88

    how hard can it be? Really, are you people that goddamn stupid? I have tried over and over again to dumb it down... there is no correlation between gun availability and homicide rate (but there is a strong correlation between culture and homocide rate)


    <a href="http://s1274.beta.photobucket.com/user/AlexisNexus/media/GunsvsHomicide2_zps41d18f5c.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1274.photobucket.com/albums/y432/AlexisNexus/GunsvsHomicide2_zps41d18f5c.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a>
     
    #47     Dec 16, 2012
  8. Box cutters are used designed to cut boxes. Airplanes are designed to transport people. Fuel is designed to propel cars and trucks. Fertilizer is designed to use on plants and crops. Physcotic killers are resourceful if nothing else. So are criminals and if we ban guns you can bet your last buck they'll be manufacturing guns themselves, as will every other foreign country. We will see no drop in violent crime. None at all. The probelm is rooted much deeper in our culture of violence.
     
    #48     Dec 16, 2012
  9. <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9iYU46n5Nkw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #49     Dec 16, 2012
  10. Bullshit. If guns were not available there would a tiny fraction of the amounts of deaths by murder and suicide that there is now. Period.

    If this latest shooter's mom was not able to get the guns she had, this sick dude would have had a much harder time doing what he did. Period.

    The fact that the gun-nuts can't acknowledge this, is the true stupidity here.
     
    #50     Dec 16, 2012