1) hand gun will just get the job done 2) hand gun will just get the job done 3) I listed earlier, the reasons why ar15 and the like will not help 4) Now this might be the first real one, however I personally not willing to let psychos easy access to such weapons over a reason of a very unlikely foreign invasion. There is no power in the world now or any foreseeable future that would be able to do it. Our geo location is pretty great, military the finest in the world by factor of many.
Most of the time yes it will. I don't see how that precludes using a rifle though. It certainly helped the Afghans and N. Vietnamese. Me neither, so lets stop this silly guns debate and lock them up. That is of course if you're serious about our children's safety in the first place. otherwise I have to assume you're more obsessed with guns than school safety.
Trying to pass legislation preventing physco's from going on a killing spree is an exercise in futility. It's the day to day violence that's the real problem. The mass murder grabs the headlines, but you stand a much higher chance of being a victim of the day to day crime rather than getting gunned down in a mass shooting. All I'm saying is let's grab the low hanging fruit first.
What's really hilarious is when morons like the two of you emote baseless nonsense and are so "sure" you're right when in fact you're absolutely wrong. This is just one example. Nobody ever said anything about bringing down the USAF with BB guns. But it's a FACT that the Army's taught how to bring down jets, cruise missiles, helicopters and UAVs with small arms fire. If you two are so sure of yourselves, bet your ET memberships on it. You have nothing of substance to offer and it would be great to get rid of you both.
Gun control isn't a conservative vs liberal issue. Many of you, who just can't think for yourself, have been played by entities like the NRA, MSNBC, FOX News, various websites, etc. The thinking people realize it is a national safety issue.
2) I explained earlier why I used the word rifle. 3) it helped because the wars were conducted with civilian population in mind. 4) Agree with your point to lock them up. This and many other things that we discussed should help.
You've implied it frequently. Every time you say things like "it needs to be reasonable" you imply that your ability to define reason supersedes our own. Pretty sure you're the only one ridiculous, as the rest of us are in alignment.