We need to teach a course in logic here. Hypothesis: It's the guns Logical Conclusion: USA would have a far higher homicide rate since USA is where the guns are Data: Mexico has far higher homicide rate Conclusion: Hypothesis is wrong That's right, it's never the person doing the killing at fault, it's the guns and always, always the USA. And when the flow is the other way as in drugs, does mexico blame the drug suppliers? Oh No, then it's the users fault. You guys are retarded
Sure, and when a guy jumps off a building to commit suicide it's not the fall that kills him it's the landing.
Oh, and let's outlaw cars since they are often used to kill people both intentionally and unintentionally. It's a blood bath out there on the roads and highways.
1. Cars are designed and produced for transportation 2. Guns are designed and produced to kill 3. Gun 'Control" is not Gun "Ban" I believe 1000% you have the right to defend your home with a gun and I personally would have no problem about shooting a home invader but I don't want to be sitting next to some guy at a bar or a football game who is armed. But that's just me.
1) But they are lethal weapons used as such every day. 2) Mostly designed for hunting and self-defense. 3) Wrong. Just as EPA rules on coal fired power plants are not a ban on coal fired power plants. The effect is the same. Notice the word BAN In Feinstein's statement - "Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said Sunday that she will introduce an assault weapons ban bill...."
1. Just because you use a hand grenade as a paperweight doesn't mean it was designed for that job and just because people die in car crashes doesn't mean they were made to murder people. 2. Yeah, like I said guns are made to Kill 3. Not really sure about that one so I'll have to take your word for it.