Well, I would say the odds of that happening will be around the odds of winning a lottery. Bringing down two......
Correct. I just used the word bazooka to identify shoulder fired missiles. So, how many air planes planes have been shot down over US soil after WW2 ended? The ban on such deadly weapons clearly shows that it has a merit and is working as it should.
Military will not use these low flying planes for airstrikes. Not sure if they even have any. They mostly use to display banners.
Not necessarily, though I think I see you point. Do we know if anyone has even tried? I mean simply "banning" something does not prevent people from getting their hands on it.
Tell it to the Army then, he who admits he's never served. It's a basic soldiers' skill. It's not easy but under the right conditions and with a little luck a group of soldiers with rifles can take down almost anything. Your ignorance and stupidity are exceeded only by your arrogance.
This is one war that government is certainly loosing. If you want we can start another thread on the subject. Btw, when I learned that original ban on drugs had stupid racial motivation for closing opium houses I was shocked. War on drugs started about 100 years ago with no end in sight. 18th clearly showed how stupid lawmakers can be and what unintended consequences such law can lead to.
The military will use those banners to say, "We surrender" when the sharpshooters start knocking the USAF out of the sky with their BB guns. LMAO
My point being that a government "ban" does NOT prevent those that really want something from getting their hands on it. Be it semi auto rifles, missiles, drugs, alcohol what ever - you name it. The Columbine HS shooters violated no less than 20 firearms laws obtaining their weapons. The laws didn't even slow them down.