Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PHOENIX TRADING, Dec 16, 2012.

  1. BSAM

    BSAM

    So, true, but right now you are in ET P&R.
    Your rights are suspended here.
     
    #321     Dec 20, 2012
  2. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    My point precisely.
     
    #322     Dec 20, 2012
  3. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    :)
     
    #323     Dec 20, 2012
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    So is the right to keep and bear arms, and supposedly it's a guaranteed right not to be infringed.

    1)What specifically about "military grade" rifles is it you think makes them worth banning vs say a 10 round semi auto "hunting" rifle?


    2) You happen to know how many firearms regulations we already have in this country?
     
    #324     Dec 20, 2012
  5. Not very bright are you?

    You can't claim "Second Amendment is actually GREAT!!!!" and then propose baseless, emotional restrictions that will do nothing more than subvert its intent.
     
    #325     Dec 20, 2012
  6. RedDuke

    RedDuke



    It does happen, thought rarely. I have seen it happening on beretta and sig. It it just very inconvenient to operate a hand gun with a hot slide. Every second counts in these deadly situations.

    As I have shown to you by your 0.7 examples, studies are often biased and do not show real picture, especially on the subject of guns. We do not even really know how many firearms we have in our country.

    My preferred allowed hunting rifle would be side by side. We both know this will not pass ever.
     
    #326     Dec 20, 2012
  7. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    You throwing insults with almost each post, clearly shows your level of intelligence.

    Would love to hear your reason why I am prohibited then from buying a bazooka. I can bear this arms. According to 2nd amendment I have the right to buy it.

    There is nothing emotional about my posts, where you clearly getting restless.
     
    #327     Dec 20, 2012
  8. BSAM

    BSAM

    Be careful about making 'em mad, brother Duke.
    (Raising eyebrows and speaking with fake scared voice...): They'll put you on ignore.:eek:
     
    #328     Dec 20, 2012
  9. I've given an intelligent argument. The Second Amendment and its intent. You haven't. All you've done is confuse AR-15s with M16s, make up baseless, arbitrary restrictions on them and magazines, and try to justify it with your stupid claim:

    That is why it is futile to cling to AR15 and think it can be used against government. Tactical airstrikes and drones will get the job if suppressing easily.

    And now you're trying to obfuscate with bazookas. :p
     
    #329     Dec 20, 2012
  10. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    No I have not. One way a town can be secured is by airstrikes destroying about 10-20% of it, the rest will be given a chance of either surrender or death. Most will surrender.

    Just because the wars are not run this way due to humanitarian reasons, does not mean they can not. The fact is AR15 will not help. The minimal required weapon for effective protection will be modern cannons, self guided rockets and grenades with launchers, and lots of them.

    I also doubt that our military will turn against us.
     
    #330     Dec 20, 2012