Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PHOENIX TRADING, Dec 16, 2012.

  1. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    I am a supporter and an owner of a hand gun.

    I am very well aware that it is not for hunting or target shooting, it is for giving citizens an ability to protect themselves.

    Why are you even bring this up?
     
    #311     Dec 20, 2012
  2. Just because you "think" the Second Amendment isn't a good argument, that doesn't make it so. FYI, shit-for-brains, nothing trumps the Constitution in this country. Nothing. If you don't like that, move out.
     
    #312     Dec 20, 2012
  3. BSAM

    BSAM

    You can chase away 5 criminals with Barney Fife's single bullet.
    Criminals are cowards.
    Bullies are cowards, but that's another discussion.

    Brother Duke, you could say the sky is blue, and some people would tell you, no it's not; I see a white cloud up there.
     
    #313     Dec 20, 2012
  4. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Anything short of man portable rockets will be pretty much waste of time. So, should we suggest to NRA to lobby bazookas for personal use?
     
    #314     Dec 20, 2012
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I've been shooting for four decades. I've NEVER had a semi auto jam because of a hot slide. Assuming a quality handgun and ammunition you'd have to fire more rounds in quick succession then I could imagine even a mass murderer being able to carry to get a gun to jam.

    Rifles can and do jam too you know.

    No offense intended, but you strike me as desperately trying to rationalize your position on your arbritrary 10 round limit and the banning of "assault" weapons.

    Again I ask, according to whom and or what study?
    That IS true.


    What specifically about "military grade" rifles is it you think makes them worth banning vs say a 10 round semi auto "hunting" rifle.?
     
    #315     Dec 20, 2012
  6. Have you ever served in the military? In combat? Do you know anything about force ratios? How resource intensive it is to secure a town or city? Do you understand what asymmetric warfare is? Etc., etc. Obviously not. I doubt our military would turn against the people. But if it did, they would stand NO CHANCE. It wouldn't even be close. That's an absolute certainty. And that's why the Second Amendment exists. It's a put on government tyranny. Once again you show your total ignorance and stupidity.
     
    #316     Dec 20, 2012
  7. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    I will try another (last) attempt to explain it to you.

    Yes, nothing trumps the Constitution. Second Amendment is actually GREAT!!!! We are lucky to live in a country where we have the right to bear arms.

    My point is that certain class of weapons have no real need to be in hand of citizens, and that any sale of weapons need to have background check. That's all.
     
    #317     Dec 20, 2012
  8. BSAM

    BSAM

    Hmmm...Well, they are legal if everyone truly does want to go by the constitution.
     
    #318     Dec 20, 2012
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    1) so far as I know no one is even advocating private ownership of bazookas
    Although I wouldn't personally be opposed to it.

    2) just so we're on the same page, exactly what scenario are we discussing here? Foreign invasion or a popular uprising against our government?
     
    #319     Dec 20, 2012
  10. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    We live in a country where free speech is guaranteed by Constitution.

    I am expressing my opinion. Many share it, many do not.
     
    #320     Dec 20, 2012