Just to prove gun control nuts are full of shit

Discussion in 'Politics' started by PHOENIX TRADING, Dec 16, 2012.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Except when you don't?

    I'm sure you just missed it, or maybe I missed the response.

    Yesterday I asked you what specifically about "military grade" rifles is it you think makes them worth banning vs say a 10 round semi auto "hunting" rifle.
     
    #301     Dec 20, 2012
  2. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Yes, most of them have no criminal history at all, in case you did not know. Just mental issues.

    You would, but you a responsible citizen with no mental issues. CT or Virginia tech piece of shits would not even know where to look for illegal gun, let alone being able to close the deal.
     
    #302     Dec 20, 2012
  3. You're as much a supporter of the Second Amendment as obama, who also implausibly claimed to be in favor of gun rights.

    IOW, you're either a liar, delusional or perhaps just confused exactly why we have a Second Amendment. Hint: it isn't to protect hunting and target shooting.

    And what is with the endless repeating of the phrase "military grade weapons?" Is that the latest talking point from the gun grabbers? What does it even mean? A bolt action 1903 Springfield is a "military grade weapon." In the right hands it can be devastating. I guess you would want to ban them too.
     
    #303     Dec 20, 2012
  4. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Come on, we all know the reason why these invasions fail. All these invasion, even the Soviet one, were conducted to preserve as much civilian population as they could. This is done for international appeal. If Soviets in Afghanistan or US in Iraq, went full force in, these countries would be wiped out of the face of the planet.

    That is why it is futile to cling to AR15 and think it can be used against government. Tactical airstrikes and drones will get the job if suppressing easily.

    God forbids this ever happens on our soil.
     
    #304     Dec 20, 2012
  5. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    Exactly why I say, that it is the job of government and supreme court to define it.
     
    #305     Dec 20, 2012
  6. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    I am not saying gun shows is the only problem. The types of weapons that are allowed to be purchased legally are.
     
    #306     Dec 20, 2012
  7. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    I am genuinely surprised that we not only agree on one but few topics. I stand by every word in this paragraph. These stupid policies are despicable.
     
    #307     Dec 20, 2012
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    If it did happen here, wouldn't "they" be trying to preserve as much civilian population as possible as well? Meaning we could certainly use AR15's and the like to good effect.
     
    #308     Dec 20, 2012
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    From where I'm sitting. YOU seem to be trying to define it though.
     
    #309     Dec 20, 2012
  10. RedDuke

    RedDuke



    I am sure you shot a hand gun before and know that even after 10 rounds the slide gets hot, and the more you shoot the hotter it gets. Therefore the possibility of jam increases. Between hot slide and its slide stop there is another possibility to stop the shooter.

    This is obviously not the case with rifles.

    One 10 bullet clip is more than enough for almost any situation to protect ones life from criminals. I am sure you know most will just run away at first hint of a gun.

    I was unlucky to face few daring situations, these bastards run away the moment they see their well being is in jeopardy in any way.
     
    #310     Dec 20, 2012